Effects of sulodexide in patients with type 2 diabetes and persistent albuminuria

Background. Urinary albumin excretion frequently persists in diabetic patients who are treated with angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEI) or angiotensin receptor blockers (ARB). Sulodexide, a glycosaminoglycan mixture of 80% heparan sulfate and 20% dermatan sulfate, has been hypothesized t...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inNephrology, dialysis, transplantation Vol. 23; no. 6; pp. 1946 - 1954
Main Authors Heerspink, Hiddo Lambers, Greene, Tom, Lewis, Julia B., Raz, Itamar, Rohde, Richard D., Hunsicker, Lawrence G., Schwartz, Sherwyn L., Aronoff, Stephen, Katz, Murray A., Eisner, Gilbert M., Mersey, James H., Wiegmann, Thomas B.
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Oxford Oxford University Press 01.06.2008
Oxford Publishing Limited (England)
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Background. Urinary albumin excretion frequently persists in diabetic patients who are treated with angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEI) or angiotensin receptor blockers (ARB). Sulodexide, a glycosaminoglycan mixture of 80% heparan sulfate and 20% dermatan sulfate, has been hypothesized to reduce persistent albuminuria. We have conducted a multi-center randomized double-blind pilot study in order to determine the effect of 6 months’ therapy with sulodexide on urinary albumin excretion and to address logistical issues for a full-scale trial. Methods. A total of 149 patients with type 2 diabetes and an albumin:creatinine ratio (ACR) between 20 and 300 mg/g were randomized with equal allocation to either placebo, 200 mg of sulodexide or 400 mg of sulodexide. The primary endpoint was the achievement, at 6 months, of either 3(1) return to normoalbuminuria (ACR < 20 mg/g with a decrease of at least 25%) or (2) a decrease in ACR of at least 50% from the baseline value. All patients used a maximum tolerated recommended FDA approved dose of an ACEI or ARB for at least 60 days and had stable blood pressure prior to randomization. Results. The primary efficacy endpoint was achieved in 25.3% of the patients in the two sulodexide groups combined versus 15.4% of the placebo-treated patients (P = 0.26). The primary endpoint was achieved in 33.3% (P = 0.075 for the comparison to placebo) in the sulodexide 200 mg group and 18.4% (P = 0.781) in the sulodexide 400 mg group. (No consistent patterns of side effects were observed. Conclusion. Based on the experience gained in this pilot study, one full-scale trial is currently being conducted to evaluate the effects of sulodexide on change in ACR in patients with persistent microalbuminuria, and a longer-term trial is underway to evaluate the effects of sulodexide on long-term renal disease progression in patients with overt proteinuria.
Bibliography:istex:1E195DF7FE8D5F892253A62BDEAE8B8B43491D15
ArticleID:gfm893
ark:/67375/HXZ-J25J757F-H
ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-News-2
ObjectType-Feature-3
content type line 23
ISSN:0931-0509
1460-2385
DOI:10.1093/ndt/gfm893