The utility of diagnostic laparoscopy in the evaluation of anterior abdominal stab wounds

Abstract Background To assess if diagnostic laparoscopy (DL) is superior to nonoperative modes (serial abdominal examination with/without computed axial tomography [CAT] and diagnostic peritoneal lavage) in determining the need for therapeutic laparotomy (TL) after anterior abdominal stab wound (ASW...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inThe American journal of surgery Vol. 196; no. 6; pp. 871 - 877
Main Authors Kopelman, Tammy R., M.D., F.A.C.S, O'Neill, Patrick J., Ph.D., M.D., F.A.C.S, Macias, Luis H., M.D, Cox, Jordy C., M.D., F.A.C.S, Matthews, Marc R., M.D., F.A.C.S, Drachman, David A., Ph.D
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published United States Elsevier Inc 01.12.2008
Elsevier Limited
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Abstract Background To assess if diagnostic laparoscopy (DL) is superior to nonoperative modes (serial abdominal examination with/without computed axial tomography [CAT] and diagnostic peritoneal lavage) in determining the need for therapeutic laparotomy (TL) after anterior abdominal stab wound (ASW). Methods Retrospective review of ASW patients. Patients were divided into group A (DL/exploratory laparotomy) to identify peritoneal violation (PV) and group B (initial nonoperative modes). Results Seventy-three patients met inclusion criteria. In group A (n = 38), 29 patients (76%) had PV by DL and underwent exploratory laparotomy. Only 10 (35%) underwent TL (sensitivity for PV = 100%; specificity and positive predictive value of PV in determining need for TL = 29% and 33%, respectively). In group B (n = 35), 7 patients (20%) underwent TL, yielding an improved specificity (96%) and positive predictive value (88%). Conclusions We find no role for DL in the evaluation of ASW patients solely to determine PV.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ISSN:0002-9610
1879-1883
DOI:10.1016/j.amjsurg.2008.07.031