DNA damage-related gene expression as biomarkers to assess cellular response after gamma irradiation of a human lymphoblastoid cell line

Since defects in molecular mechanisms controlling DNA repair, cell cycle checkpoint and apoptosis could modify cellular sensitivity to DNA damaging agents, we have conducted a multiparametric molecular analysis for better understanding the regulation pathways leading to cell survival or cell death a...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inOncogene Vol. 19; no. 7; pp. 916 - 923
Main Authors BISHAY, K, ORY, K, LEBEAU, J, LEVALOIS, C, OLIVIER, M.-F, CHEVILLARD, S
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Basingstoke Nature Publishing 17.02.2000
Nature Publishing Group
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Since defects in molecular mechanisms controlling DNA repair, cell cycle checkpoint and apoptosis could modify cellular sensitivity to DNA damaging agents, we have conducted a multiparametric molecular analysis for better understanding the regulation pathways leading to cell survival or cell death after irradiation. Using a human lymphoblastoid cell line, we have analysed, following gamma irradiation (0.5, 1, 2, 4, 8, 16 and 32 Gy, at 0.5, 24, 48 and 72 h after treatment), the correlation between proliferation, cell cycle analysis, apoptosis and micronuclei frequency with the expression of TP53, WAF1, DNA LIGASE 1, PCNA, BAX, BLC-2, BAK, DAD1, ICH1-Long and -Short forms mRNAs. We have found that whereas TP53, BAK, ICH1-Short form, and DAD1 were expressed at constant levels, WAF1, PCNA, BAX were up-regulated, ICH1-Long form, DNA LIGASE 1, and BCL-2 were down-regulated. These modifications of expression were significantly correlated with doses, survival, proliferation, cell cycle delays, and apoptosis. A positive correlation of WAF1 and BAX, and a borderline negative correlation with BCL-2 expressions were observed with micronuclei frequency for doses ranging from 0.5 to 4 Gy. In conclusion, our data clearly demonstrate that gene expression profiling, which is easier and more rapid to conduct than the assessments of classical phenotypic responses, could be useful to improve knowledge concerning pathways involved in cellular response to irradiation, knowing that such biomarkers could constitute tools to assess radio-sensitivity/radio-resistance. Oncogene (2000) 19, 916 - 923.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-2
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-1
content type line 23
ObjectType-Article-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
ISSN:0950-9232
1476-5594
DOI:10.1038/sj.onc.1203405