Efficacy of Mechanical Insufflation-Exsufflation in Medically Stable Patients With Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis

To determine under what circumstances the use of mechanical insufflation-exsufflation (MI-E) can generate clinically effective expiratory flows for airway clearance (> 2.7 L/s) for clinically stable patients with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS). Twenty-six consecutive patients with ALS were s...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inChest Vol. 125; no. 4; pp. 1400 - 1405
Main Authors Sancho, Jesús, Servera, Emilio, Díaz, Juan, Marín, Julio
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Northbrook, IL Elsevier Inc 01.04.2004
American College of Chest Physicians
Subjects
MIC
ROC
ALS
PCF
NEP
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:To determine under what circumstances the use of mechanical insufflation-exsufflation (MI-E) can generate clinically effective expiratory flows for airway clearance (> 2.7 L/s) for clinically stable patients with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS). Twenty-six consecutive patients with ALS were studied, 15 with severe bulbar dysfunction. Using a pneumotachograph and with the aid of an oronasal mask, we measured FVC, FEV1, peak cough flow (PCF), maximum insufflation capacity (MIC), PCF generated from a maximum insufflation MIC (PCFmic), and PCF generated by MI-E (PCFmi-e). MI-E was delivered at ± 40 cm H2O. Maximum inspiratory pressure (Pimax) and maximum expiratory pressure (Pemax) at the mouth were also measured. Although both groups had a similar time from ALS symptom onset to diagnosis, statistical differences (p < 0.05) were found between nonbulbar and bulbar patients in lung function and cough capacity parameters: FVC, 2.58 ± 1.24 L vs 1.62 ± 0.74 L; FEV1, 2.26 ± 1.18 L vs 1.54 ± 0.69 L; Pimax, – 93.45 ± 47.47 cm H2O vs − 3.64 ± 25.07 cm H2O; Pemax, 140.45 ± 75.98 cm H2O vs 69.93 ± 32.14 cm H2O; MIC, 3.02 ± 1.22 L vs 1.97 ± 0.75 L; PCF, 5.91 ± 2.55 L/s vs 3.42 ± 1.44 L/s; PCFmic, 6.68 ± 2.71 L/s vs 4.00 ± 1.48 L/s; and PCFmi-e, 4.34 ± 0.82 L/s vs 3.35 ± 0.77 L/s. Four patients with bulbar dysfunction and MIC > 1 L had PCFmi-e < 2.7 L/s. The receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis showed PCFmic of ≤ 2.7 L/s predicting those patients with PCFmi-e < 2.7 L/s. The ROC curve analysis showed PCFmic > 4 L/s predicting those patients with PCFmic greater than PCFmi-e. MI-E is able to generate clinically effective PCFmi-e (> 2.7 L/s) for stable patients with ALS, except for those with bulbar dysfunction who also have a MIC > 1 L and PCFmic <2.7 L/s who probably have severe dynamic collapse of the upper airways during the exsufflation cycle. Clinically stable patients with mild respiratory dysfunction and PCFmic > 4 L/s might not benefit from MI-E except during an acute respiratory illness.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ISSN:0012-3692
1931-3543
DOI:10.1378/chest.125.4.1400