An Algorithm for Choosing the Optimal Number of Muscle Synergies during Walking

• Published in: Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) Vol. 21; no. 10; p. 3311
• Main Authors: Ballarini, Riccardo, Ghislieri, Marco, Knaflitz, Marco, Agostini, Valentina
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: Basel MDPI AG 11.05.2021; MDPI
• Subjects: Algorithms; Datasets; Gait; Hypotheses; locomotion; motor module; Noise; number of synergies; Standard deviation; VAF; Italy
• ISSN: 1424-8220; 1424-8220
• DOI: 10.3390/s21103311

In motor control studies, the 90% thresholding of variance accounted for (VAF) is the classical way of selecting the number of muscle synergies expressed during a motor task. However, the adoption of an arbitrary cut-off has evident drawbacks. The aim of this work is to describe and validate an algorithm for choosing the optimal number of muscle synergies (ChoOSyn), which can overcome the limitations of VAF-based methods. The proposed algorithm is built considering the following principles: (1) muscle synergies should be highly consistent during the various motor task epochs (i.e., remaining stable in time), (2) muscle synergies should constitute a base with low intra-level similarity (i.e., to obtain information-rich synergies, avoiding redundancy). The algorithm performances were evaluated against traditional approaches (threshold-VAF at 90% and 95%, elbow-VAF and plateau-VAF), using both a simulated dataset and a real dataset of 20 subjects. The performance evaluation was carried out by analyzing muscle synergies extracted from surface electromyographic (sEMG) signals collected during walking tasks lasting 5 min. On the simulated dataset, ChoOSyn showed comparable performances compared to VAF-based methods, while, in the real dataset, it clearly outperformed the other methods, in terms of the fraction of correct classifications, mean error (ME), and root mean square error (RMSE). The proposed approach may be beneficial to standardize the selection of the number of muscle synergies between different research laboratories, independent of arbitrary thresholds.