Market structure, welfare, and banking reform in China
► This paper examines the effects of market reform on consumers and state commercial banks in China. ► Overall, China’s banking reforms have achieved mixed results in the deposit market. ► There is a welfare gain from more consumers joining in the market, but the existing consumers suffer welfare lo...
Saved in:
Published in | Journal of Comparative Economics Vol. 40; no. 2; pp. 291 - 313 |
---|---|
Main Author | |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
San Diego
Elsevier Inc
01.05.2012
Elsevier Elsevier BV |
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
Cover
Loading…
Summary: | ► This paper examines the effects of market reform on consumers and state commercial banks in China. ► Overall, China’s banking reforms have achieved mixed results in the deposit market. ► There is a welfare gain from more consumers joining in the market, but the existing consumers suffer welfare losses due to declined service quality. ► The welfare effects are unevenly distributed, with losses skewed toward inland provinces and certain consumer groups. ► The price-cost margins of some state commercial banks have fallen over time, but the pricing of banking services has not become more competitive.
This paper examines the effects of market reform on consumers and state commercial banks in China, a large developing country. I jointly estimate a system of differentiated product demand and pricing equations under alternative market structures. Overall, China’s banking reforms have achieved mixed results. Although there is a welfare gain from more consumers participating in the deposit market, the existing consumers suffer welfare losses because of declined service quality. The welfare effects are unevenly distributed, with losses skewed toward inland provinces and certain consumer groups. There is no clear evidence that the pricing of banking services has become more competitive after the reform, and such pricing remains subject to government intervention. Encouragingly, the price-cost margins of some state commercial banks have fallen over time. |
---|---|
Bibliography: | SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-1 content type line 14 ObjectType-Article-2 content type line 23 |
ISSN: | 0147-5967 1095-7227 |
DOI: | 10.1016/j.jce.2011.07.006 |