Fixed or mobile bearing unicompartmental knee replacement? A comparative cohort study

• Published in: The knee Vol. 11; no. 5; pp. 379 - 384
• Main Authors: Gleeson, R.E., Evans, R., Ackroyd, C.E., Webb, J., Newman, J.H.
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: Netherlands Elsevier B.V 01.10.2004; Elsevier Limited
• Subjects: Aged; Arthritis; Arthroplasty, Replacement, Knee - methods; Female; Fixed bearing; Humans; Joint surgery; Knee; Knee Prosthesis; Male; Middle Aged; Mobile bearing; Osteoarthritis, Knee - surgery; Outcome Assessment (Health Care); Pain - surgery; Prospective Studies; Prosthesis Design; Reoperation - statistics & numerical data; Sports medicine; Unicompartmental knee replacement; United Kingdom; Weight-Bearing; Fixed bearing; Mobile bearing; Unicompartmental knee replacement
• ISSN: 0968-0160; 1873-5800
• DOI: 10.1016/j.knee.2004.06.006

Unicompartmental knee replacement (UKR) for anteromedial osteoarthritis is a well-established technique. Numerous clinical outcome studies demonstrate good medium and long-term results. The aim of this prospective study was to compare the complications and short-term clinical outcome of the St. Georg Sled, a fixed bearing UKR, with the Oxford mobile bearing UKR. Outcome at 2 years was assessed using the Bristol knee score and the Oxford knee score; in addition, complications occurring since formal scoring at 2-year follow-up were recorded. A total of 47 Oxford UKRs and 57 St. Georg Sled UKRs were performed in 91 patients, none of whom were lost to follow-up. At 2 years, both outcome measures were better for the St. Georg Sled Group. The pain component of the Bristol knee score was significantly better for this group ( p-value=0.013). Three patients in the Oxford group had bearing dislocations and a further four patients required revision (mean time to revision 3.0 years). In the St. Georg Sled group, three patients required revisions (mean time to revision 3.4 years). These results demonstrate that in the short-term, the Oxford mobile bearing prosthesis has a higher re-operation rate and that the St. Georg Sled achieves better pain relief. The functional scores of the two groups were similar.