Patient‐specific cutting guides increase accuracy of medial opening wedge high tibial osteotomy procedure: A retrospective case‐control study

• Published in: Journal of experimental orthopaedics Vol. 11; no. 1; pp. e12013 - n/a
• Main Authors: Fayard, Jean‐Marie, Saad, Maxime, Gomes, Lucas, Kacem, Sami, Abid, Hichem, Vieira, Thais D., Lambrey, Pierre‐Jean, Ollivier, Matthieu, Thaunat, Mathieu
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: United States John Wiley and Sons Inc 01.01.2024; Wiley
• Subjects: medial open‐wedge high tibial osteotomy; Original Paper; Original Papers; patient‐specific cutting guide; tibial osteotomy accuracy; 3D; medial open‐wedge high tibial osteotomy; patient‐specific cutting guide; tibial osteotomy accuracy
• ISSN: 2197-1153; 2197-1153
• DOI: 10.1002/jeo2.12013

Purpose To compare the accuracy of patient‐specific guides (PSCG) to the standard technique in medial open‐wedge high tibial osteotomy (OWHTO). Secondary objectives were to evaluate factors that could influence accuracy and to compare the complication rate and operating time for both procedures. Methods A retrospective analysis of prospective collected data was performed. Between March 2011 and May 2018, 49 patients with isolated medial knee osteoarthritis who were operated for OWHTO using PSCG and 38 patients using the standard technique were included. Preoperative and postoperative deformities were evaluated on long leg radiographs by measuring the mechanical medial proximal tibial angle, mechanical lateral distal femoral angle, hip knee ankle angle (HKA), and joint line convergence angle. Pre‐ and postoperative posterior tibial slope was also evaluated. Accuracy was evaluated by analysing the difference between the preoperative planned and the actual postoperative HKA. Operating time and complication rate were also recorded in both groups. Results The mean preoperative HKA was 173.4° (±3.1°) in the PSCG group and 173.3° (±2.4°) in the standard group (p = 0.8416). Mean planned HKA were 182.8° (±1.1°) and 184.0° (±0°) respectively for the PSCG and the standard group. Mean postoperative HKA were 181.9° (±1.9°) and 182.6° (±3.1°) respectively for the PSCG and the standard group. An accuracy of ±2° in the HKA was achieved in 44 (90%) in the PSCG group and 24 (65%) in the standard group (p = 0.006). The probability of achieving a HKA accuracy was four times higher for patients in the PSCG group (odds ratio [OR] = 4.06, [1.1; 15.3], p = 0.038). Also, higher preoperative Ahlback grade was associated with precision, all other parameters being equal (OR = 4.2, [0.13; 0.97], p = 0.04). Conclusion In this study, the PSCG technique was significantly more accurate for achieving the planned HKA in OWHTO. Complication rates and operating times were comparable between groups. Level of Evidence Level IV, case‐control study.