Probability of porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome (PRRS) virus infection as a function of exposure route and dose

• Published in: Veterinary microbiology Vol. 110; no. 1; pp. 7 - 16
• Main Authors: Hermann, J.R., Muñoz-Zanzi, C.A., Roof, M.B., Burkhart, K., Zimmerman, J.J.
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: Amsterdam Elsevier B.V 30.09.2005; Elsevier Science
• Subjects: Administration, Intranasal; Administration, Oral; Animals; Antibodies, Viral - blood; Biological and medical sciences; Carrier State - veterinary; dietary exposure; disease transmission; dose response; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology; Infectious dose; inhalation exposure; injection; Injections, Intramuscular - veterinary; Intranasal; Logistic Models; Maximum Tolerated Dose; Microbiology; Miscellaneous; Oral; piglets; porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome; Porcine Reproductive and Respiratory Syndrome - immunology; Porcine Reproductive and Respiratory Syndrome - prevention & control; Porcine Reproductive and Respiratory Syndrome - transmission; Porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome virus; Porcine respiratory and reproductive syndrome virus; Porcine respiratory and reproductive syndrome virus - immunology; Porcine respiratory and reproductive syndrome virus - pathogenicity; probability analysis; PRRS; Random Allocation; Swine; Transmission; Virology; Infectious dose; Oral; Intranasal; PRRS; Transmission; Microbiology; Arterivirus; Intranasal administration; Infection; Virus; Vertebrata; Mammalia; Swine; Arteriviridae; Viral disease; Swine infertility respiratory syndrome virus; Artiodactyla; Veterinary; Nidovirales; Ungulata
• ISSN: 0378-1135; 1873-2542
• DOI: 10.1016/j.vetmic.2005.06.012

At the most elemental level, the design of effective strategies to control and/or eliminate porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome (PRRS) virus depend on an accurate and comprehensive understanding of virus transmission. As a general rule, transmission is highly dependent on the route of exposure and the dose of virus. The objective of this study was to derive PRRS virus isolate VR-2332 dose–response curves for oral and intranasal routes of exposure, i.e., determine the probability that a specific virus dose would result in infection. Individually housed pigs approximately 21 days of age were exposed to specific doses of PRRS virus isolate VR-2332 by either oral or intranasal routes. Positive controls were intramuscularly inoculated with 10 2.2 50% tissue culture infective dose (TCID 50) of PRRS virus and negative controls were orally administered 100 ml of diluent with no virus. Pigs were monitored for evidence of infection for 21 days following exposure, i.e., serum samples were collected on days 0, 7, 14, 21, and tested for virus and PRRS virus-specific antibodies. Dose–response curves and 95% confidence intervals for oral and intranasal routes of exposure were derived using logistic models (logit and probit). The infectious dose 50 (ID 50) for oral exposure was estimated to be 10 5.3 TCID 50 (95% CI, 10 4.6 and 10 5.9); the ID 50 for intranasal exposure was estimated to be 10 4.0 TCID 50 (95% CI, 10 3.0 and 10 5.0). Given these estimates, it is worth noting that intramuscular exposure of animals to 10 2.2 TCID 50 (positive controls) resulted in infection in all animals. Thus pigs were the most susceptible to infection via parenteral exposure.