Framing the future: The 'Foundation' series, foundation models and framing AI

Are we at risk of preserving in digital aspic current hegemonic ways of doing, talking and thinking about law and economy? Our dominant frames are those of neoclassical economics and doctrinal law, which, combined, align with neoliberal assumptions and preferences. Invisible through their ubiquity,...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inLaw, technology and humans Vol. 4; no. 2; pp. 109 - 123
Main Author Williams, Clare
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Queensland University of Technology 01.11.2022
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text
ISSN2652-4074
2652-4074
DOI10.5204/lthj.2452

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Are we at risk of preserving in digital aspic current hegemonic ways of doing, talking and thinking about law and economy? Our dominant frames are those of neoclassical economics and doctrinal law, which, combined, align with neoliberal assumptions and preferences. Invisible through their ubiquity, these partially reveal and conceal problems and solutions, perpetuating inequalities. And yet, unlike social biases, our framing tends to fly largely under the radar, as we see in Isaac Asimov's 'Foundation' series. Taking three themes from Asimov's work that align with current hegemonic frames, namely the centrality of the individual as the subject, a belief in scientism and technological progress to save humanity, and a dissatisfaction with the limitations of language, this paper explores what, how and why we might exercise caution in the development of natural language processing (NLP) artificial intelligence (AI). By drawing parallels with Asimov's work and the development of foundation models that underpin all NLP AI systems, this paper asks to what extent neoliberal framing and the inequalities perpetuated therein might come to be embedded in future technologies.
Bibliography:Law, Technology and Humans, Vol. 4, No. 2, Nov 2022, 109-123
Informit, Melbourne (Vic)
ISSN:2652-4074
2652-4074
DOI:10.5204/lthj.2452