Development and validation of a knowledge, attitude, and practice questionnaire regarding exercise and exergames for obese patients with gout

• Published in: BMC public health Vol. 24; no. 1; pp. 2638 - 11
• Main Authors: Cao, Manting, Ahmad Yusof, Hazwani, Chen, Jianer, Zhou, Liping
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: England BioMed Central Ltd 27.09.2024; BioMed Central; BMC
• Subjects: Adult; Aged; Analysis; Attitude; Attitudes; Cardiovascular disease; Care and treatment; Causes of; Complications and side effects; Computer & video games; Demographic aspects; Electronic games; Evaluation; Exercise; Exercise - psychology; Exercise therapy; Exergames; Factor analysis; Female; Gout; Gout - psychology; Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice; Humans; Knowledge; Male; Middle Aged; Obesity; Obesity - psychology; Obesity - therapy; Patient outcomes; Patients; Physical exercise; Physical fitness; Questionnaires; Reproducibility of Results; Rheumatism; Risk factors; Structural reliability; Surveys and Questionnaires - standards; Uric acid; Validity; Video game industry; Video Games; Malaysia; Japan; Obesity; Exercise; Exergames; Attitude; Gout; Practice; Knowledge
• ISSN: 1471-2458; 1471-2458
• DOI: 10.1186/s12889-024-20076-w

The Knowledge-Attitude-Practice (KAP) Questionnaire could help investigate whether there are misconceptions, positive attitudes, and adequate practice in people with gout about exercise and exergames. The study aims to develop and validate the KAP questionnaire regarding exercise and exergames for obese patients with gout to understand gout 'patients' awareness level of exercise and perception of exergames. The development and validation of the questionnaire involved two phases: (1) development of the instrument and (2) judgment of the instrument through calculating the content validity by the expert panel and using SPSS version 28 to examine the test-retest reliability, internal consistency, and structural validity of the instrument. After the first phase of instrument development, an initial questionnaire consisting of six parts with 35 items was identified. After the content validation of the second phase, 11 items with a content validity ratio (CVR) value below 0.99 were eliminated, 3 items were rephrased, 2 items that mixed two statements were divided, and 15 items were added based on the original instrument. In addition, in the factor analysis, five items within the knowledge domain with factor loadings below 0.4 were removed. The final questionnaire was examined and demonstrated acceptable content validity, test-retest reliability, internal consistency, and construct validity.