Classification and Properties of Dental Zirconia as Implant Fixtures and Superstructures

• Published in: Materials Vol. 14; no. 17; p. 4879
• Main Author: Ban, Seiji
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: Basel MDPI AG 27.08.2021; MDPI
• Subjects: Adhesion; Aesthetics; Alumina; Aluminum oxide; ceramics; Classification; Composite materials; Crack propagation; Dental implants; Dental materials; dental zirconia; Evolution; Fixtures; Fracture strength; Fractures; Grain boundaries; implant fixture; implant superstructure; Low temperature; Multilayers; Nanocomposites; properties; Review; Roughening; Soft tissues; Superstructures; Surface activation; Surface treatment; Titanium; Yttria-stabilized zirconia; Yttrium oxide; Zirconium dioxide
• ISSN: 1996-1944; 1996-1944
• DOI: 10.3390/ma14174879

Various types of zirconia are widely used for the fabrication of dental implant superstructures and fixtures. Zirconia–alumina composites, such as ATZ and NanoZR, are adequate for implant fixtures because they have excellent mechanical strength in spite of insufficient esthetic properties. On the other hand, yttria-stabilized zirconia has been used for implant superstructures because of sufficient esthetic properties. They are classified to 12 types with yttria content, monochromatic/polychromatic, uniform/hybrid composition, and monolayer/multilayer. Zirconia with a higher yttria content has higher translucency and lower mechanical strength. Fracture strength of superstructures strongly depends on the strength on the occlusal contact region. It suggests that adequate zirconia should be selected as the superstructure crown, depending on whether strength or esthetics is prioritized. Low temperature degradation of zirconia decreases with yttria content, but even 3Y zirconia has a sufficient durability in oral condition. Although zirconia is the hardest dental materials, zirconia restorative rarely subjects the antagonist teeth to occlusal wear when it is mirror polished. Furthermore, zirconia has less bacterial adhesion and better soft tissue adhesion when it is mirror polished. This indicates that zirconia has advantageous for implant superstructures. As implant fixtures, zirconia is required for surface modification to obtain osseointegration to bone. Various surface treatments, such as roughening, surface activation, and coating, has been developed and improved. It is concluded that an adequately selected zirconia is a suitable material as implant superstructures and fixtures because of mechanically, esthetically, and biologically excellent properties.