Umbilical cord blood lactate: A valuable tool in the assessment of fetal metabolic acidosis

Abstract Objective The aim of the present study was (1) to evaluate the relationship between umbilical cord arterial blood lactate and pH, standard base excess (SBE), and actual base excess (ABE) at delivery and (2) to suggest a cut-off level of umbilical cord arterial blood lactate in predicting fe...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inEuropean journal of obstetrics & gynecology and reproductive biology Vol. 139; no. 1; pp. 16 - 20
Main Authors Gjerris, Anne Cathrine, Stær-Jensen, Jette, Jørgensen, Jan Stener, Bergholt, Thomas, Nickelsen, Carsten
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Shannon Elsevier Ireland Ltd 01.07.2008
Elsevier
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Abstract Objective The aim of the present study was (1) to evaluate the relationship between umbilical cord arterial blood lactate and pH, standard base excess (SBE), and actual base excess (ABE) at delivery and (2) to suggest a cut-off level of umbilical cord arterial blood lactate in predicting fetal asphyxia using ROC-curves, where an ABE value less than −12 was used as “gold standard” for significant intrapartum asphyxia. Study design This is a descriptive study of umbilical cord arterial blood samples from 2554 singleton deliveries. The deliveries took place at the Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Hvidovre University Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark where umbilical cord blood sampling and blood gas analysis is part of the routine assessment of all newborns. Results We found significant correlations between lactate and pH ( r = −0.73), lactate and SBE ( r = −0.76), and lactate and ABE ( r = −0.83). ROC-curves suggested a lactate cut-off level of 8 mmol/l for indicating intrapartum asphyxia. Conclusion Lactate in arterial umbilical cord blood might be a more direct and accordingly more correct indicator of fetal asphyxia at delivery than pH and SBE (or ABE). Its potential as a predictor of neonatal outcome needs to be evaluated in future studies.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ISSN:0301-2115
1872-7654
DOI:10.1016/j.ejogrb.2007.10.004