Comparative evaluation of molecular assays for the identification of intestinal spirochaetes from diseased pigs
Rapid identification of porcine Brachyspira species is required in order to differentiate pathogenic from non-pathogenic species. The aim of our study was to compare a recently described genetic method based on polymerase chain reaction (PCR) and restriction fragment length polymorphism (RFLP), nox...
Saved in:
Published in | Veterinary microbiology Vol. 118; no. 1; pp. 91 - 100 |
---|---|
Main Authors | , , , , , , |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
Amsterdam
Elsevier B.V
26.11.2006
Elsevier Science |
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
Cover
Loading…
Summary: | Rapid identification of porcine
Brachyspira species is required in order to differentiate pathogenic from non-pathogenic species.
The aim of our study was to compare a recently described genetic method based on polymerase chain reaction (PCR) and restriction fragment length polymorphism (RFLP),
nox RFLP-PCR assay, and three species-specific PCRs described previously in the literature with a 16S rRNA gene RFLP-PCR discriminatory reference assay (16S RFLP-PCR) for the identification of
Brachyspira spp. of swine origin.
In this study, 20 porcine spirochaetal strains were identified and compared to 33 reference strains by 16S RFLP-PCR and
nox RFLP-PCR and three species-specific PCRs.
RFLP-PCR methods showed concordant results for 47 strains and discordances for 6 strains (2 differently identified and 4 not revealed by
nox RFLP-PCR). In our hands species-specific PCRs showed concordant results with 16S and
nox RFLP-PCR for 43 strains and discordances for 10 strains (2 differently identified and 8 not amplified).
The same results observed testing the 20 field-isolated spirochaetes were obtained for the corresponding porcine faecal samples. The detection limit was 10
2–10
3 cells/g of faeces for 16S rRNA gene PCR and 10
4 cells/g of faeces for
nox PCR.
In our experience
nox RFLP-PCR appeared successful for the speciation of
B. hyodysenteriae reserving 16S RFLP-PCR for all other pathogenic and non-pathogenic
Brachyspira species. Among the species-specific PCR assays tested only that for
B. pilosicoli was useful in our hands. |
---|---|
Bibliography: | http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.vetmic.2006.06.022 ObjectType-Article-1 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 content type line 23 |
ISSN: | 0378-1135 1873-2542 |
DOI: | 10.1016/j.vetmic.2006.06.022 |