Hybrid statistical and machine learning modeling of cognitive neuroscience data

The nested data structure is prevalent for cognitive measure experiments due to repeatedly taken observations from different brain locations within subjects. The analysis methods used for this data type should consider the dependency structure among the repeated measurements. However, the dependency...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inJournal of applied statistics Vol. 51; no. 6; pp. 1076 - 1097
Main Authors Cakar, Serenay, Yavuz, Fulya Gokalp
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published England Taylor & Francis 25.04.2024
Taylor & Francis Ltd
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:The nested data structure is prevalent for cognitive measure experiments due to repeatedly taken observations from different brain locations within subjects. The analysis methods used for this data type should consider the dependency structure among the repeated measurements. However, the dependency assumption is mainly ignored in the cognitive neuroscience data analysis literature. We consider both statistical, and machine learning methods extended to repeated data analysis and compare distinct algorithms in terms of their advantage and disadvantages. Unlike basic algorithm comparison studies, this article analyzes novel neuroscience data considering the dependency structure for the first time with several statistical and machine learning methods and their hybrid forms. In addition, the fitting performances of different algorithms are compared using contaminated data sets, and the cross-validation approach. One of our findings suggests that the GLMM tree, including random term indices indicating the location of functional near-infrared spectroscopy optodes nested within experimental units, shows the best predictive performance with the lowest MSE, RMSE, and MAE model performance metrics. However, there is a trade-off between accuracy and speed since this algorithm is required the highest computational time.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 14
content type line 23
ISSN:0266-4763
1360-0532
DOI:10.1080/02664763.2023.2176834