Impact of a family support intervention on hospitalization costs and hospital readmissions among ICU patients at high risk of death or severe functional impairment

• Published in: Annals of intensive care Vol. 14; no. 1; pp. 103 - 9
• Main Authors: Andersen, Sarah K., Chang, Chung-Chou H., Arnold, Robert M., Pidro, Caroline, Darby, Joseph M., Angus, Derek C., White, Douglas B.
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: Cham Springer International Publishing 02.07.2024; Springer Nature B.V; SpringerOpen
• Subjects: Anesthesiology; Communication; Cost-effectiveness; Costs; Critical care; Critical Care Medicine; Emergency Medicine; Health services research; Hospitalization; Intensive; Intensive care; Medicine; Medicine & Public Health; NCT; NCT01844492; Patient centered care; Social support; Critical care; Cost-effectiveness; Patient centered care; Communication; Health services research
• ISSN: 2110-5820; 2110-5820
• DOI: 10.1186/s13613-024-01344-9

Background Patients with advanced critical illness often receive more intensive treatment than they would choose for themselves, which contributes to high health care costs near the end of life. The purpose of this study was to determine whether a family support intervention delivered by the interprofessional ICU team decreases hospitalization costs and hospital readmissions among critically ill patients at high risk of death or severe functional impairment. Results We examined index hospitalization costs as well as post-discharge utilization of acute care hospitals, rehabilitation and skilled nursing facilities, and hospice services for the PARTNER trial, a multicenter, stepped-wedge, cluster randomized trial of an interprofessional ICU family support intervention. We determined patients’ total controllable and direct variable costs using a computerized accounting system. We determined post-discharge resource utilization (as defined above) by structured telephone interview at 6-month follow-up. We used multiple variable regression modelling to compare outcomes between groups. Compared to usual care, the PARTNER intervention resulted in significantly lower total controllable costs (geometric mean: $26,529 vs $32,105; log-linear coefficient: − 0.30; 95% CI − 0.49, − 0.11) and direct variable costs ($3912 vs $6034; − 0.33; 95% CI − 0.56, − 0.10). A larger cost reduction occurred for decedents ($20,304 vs. $26,610; − 0.66; 95% CI − 1.01, − 0.31) compared to survivors ($31,353 vs. $35,015; − 0.15; 95% CI − 0.35,0.05). A lower proportion in the intervention arm were re-admitted to an acute care hospital (34.9% vs 45.1%; 0.66; 95% CI 0.56, 0.77) or skilled nursing facility (25.3% vs 31.6%; 0.63; 95% CI 0.47, 0.84). Conclusions A family support intervention delivered by the interprofessional ICU team significantly decreased index hospitalization costs and readmission rates over 6-month follow-up. Trial registration Trial registration number: NCT01844492