Comparing the effects of neck stabilization exercises versus dynamic exercises among patients having nonspecific neck pain with forward head posture: a randomized clinical trial

• Published in: BMC musculoskeletal disorders Vol. 25; no. 1; pp. 707 - 12
• Main Authors: Batool, Asma, Soomro, Rabail Rani, Baig, Aftab Ahmed Mirza
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: England BioMed Central Ltd 04.09.2024; BioMed Central; BMC
• Subjects: Adolescent; Adult; Care and treatment; Clinical trials; Computers; Consent; Disability; Disability Evaluation; Electrodes; Ergonomics; Exercise therapy; Exercise Therapy - methods; Female; Head; Head and neck; Humans; Isometric exercises; Isotonic exercises; Male; Methods; Neck - physiopathology; Neck pain; Neck Pain - physiopathology; Neck Pain - therapy; Nonspecific neck pain; Pain; Pain Measurement; Pandemics; Patients; Posture; Posture disorders; Questionnaires; Range of Motion, Articular; Sample size; Shoulder; Single-Blind Method; Statistical analysis; Testing; Treatment Outcome; Young Adult; Pakistan; Nonspecific neck pain; Isometric exercises; Isotonic exercises
• ISSN: 1471-2474; 1471-2474
• DOI: 10.1186/s12891-024-07749-8

Nonspecific neck pain (NSNP) is a well-established global burden affecting. It is also a common problem in Pakistan. The burden of neck pain is also increasing day by day due to poor work ergonomics, and increased use of computers and mobiles after the pandemic. An individual's poor posture is often associated with forward head posture (FHP). Limited evidence is available about the effects of neck stabilization (NSE) and dynamic exercises (NDE) for nonspecific neck pain particularly in patients with FHP. This aimed to compare the effects of NSE versus NDE among patients having NSNP with FHP in reducing pain, disability, forward head posture and improving neck range of motion. It is a single-blinded randomized clinical trial with 60 patients aged 18-40 years, with moderate intensity NSNP for > 3 weeks and < 6 months along with FHP with a moderate disability on neck disability index (NDI) randomly assigned to the treatment groups. Group 1 was doing NSE and group 2 was doing NDE. Transcutaneous Electical Nerve Stimulation, cold packs, and stretching exercises were given to both groups. A total of 9 sessions (3 sessions/ week) were given to participants. NDI questionnaire, Visual analogue scale (VAS), goniometry, and plumb line measurement tool were used as baseline and assessment at the end of 3rd week. The data was analyzed on SPSS version 21. Descriptive analysis was performed. Independent t-test was used for between group comparison and paired t-test used for within group comparison. A p-value less than 0.05 was considered statistically significant. After treatment within-group analysis of both NSE and NDE showed significant (p < 0.001) improvement in pain on VAS, all ROMs of the neck including flexion, extension, left and right lateral flexion and left rotation, plumb line and NDI score with very large effect size. However, between-group analysis showed non-significant differences (p > 0.05) for post-treatment mean VAS, neck ROM, NDI and plumb line measurement. Between NSE and NDE, no one is more beneficial than another. Both are equally effective in alleviating pain, increasing ROM, decreasing functional disability, and improving forward head posture in patients with NSNP. Registered trial at ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT05298631, 28/03/2022, prospectively registered.