Molecular mechanisms leading to ceftolozane/tazobactam resistance in clinical isolates of Pseudomonas aeruginosa from five Latin American countries

• Published in: Frontiers in microbiology Vol. 13; p. 1035609
• Main Authors: Mojica, María F., De La Cadena, Elsa, Ríos, Rafael, García-Betancur, Juan Carlos, Díaz, Lorena, Reyes, Jinnethe, Hernández-Gómez, Cristhian, Radice, Marcela, Gales, Ana C., Castañeda Méndez, Paulo, Munita, José M., Pallares, Christian José, Martínez, José R. W., Villegas, María Virginia
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: Frontiers Media S.A 24.10.2022
• Subjects: antibiotic resistance; ceftolozane/tazobactam; Latin America; Microbiology; molecular mechanisms; Pseudomonas aeruginosa
• ISSN: 1664-302X; 1664-302X
• DOI: 10.3389/fmicb.2022.1035609

Identify molecular mechanisms responsible for the in vitro non-susceptibility to ceftolozane/tazobactam (TOL) in a group of 158 clinical isolates of Pseudomonas aeruginosa from five Latin American countries collected before the introduction of TOL into the clinical practice.ObjectivesIdentify molecular mechanisms responsible for the in vitro non-susceptibility to ceftolozane/tazobactam (TOL) in a group of 158 clinical isolates of Pseudomonas aeruginosa from five Latin American countries collected before the introduction of TOL into the clinical practice.Clinical isolates of P. aeruginosa (n = 504) were collected between January 2016 and October 2017 from 20 hospitals located in Argentina, Brazil, Chile, Colombia, and Mexico. Minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs) to TOL were determined by standard broth microdilution and interpreted according to CLSI breakpoints. Initially, production of carbapenemases in TOL non-susceptible isolates was assessed by Rapidec® followed by qPCR to detect bla KPC, bla NDM-1, bla VIM, and bla IMP. Illumina® WGS was performed for isolates in which non-susceptibility to TOL was not mediated by carbapenemases.MethodsClinical isolates of P. aeruginosa (n = 504) were collected between January 2016 and October 2017 from 20 hospitals located in Argentina, Brazil, Chile, Colombia, and Mexico. Minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs) to TOL were determined by standard broth microdilution and interpreted according to CLSI breakpoints. Initially, production of carbapenemases in TOL non-susceptible isolates was assessed by Rapidec® followed by qPCR to detect bla KPC, bla NDM-1, bla VIM, and bla IMP. Illumina® WGS was performed for isolates in which non-susceptibility to TOL was not mediated by carbapenemases.A total of 158 (31.3%) isolates were non-susceptible to TOL. In 74 (46.8%) of these isolates, non-susceptibility to TOL was explained by the production of at least one carbapenemase. WGS revealed that some isolates carried ESBLs, mutated bla PDC and ampD, associated with decreased susceptibility to TOL.ResultsA total of 158 (31.3%) isolates were non-susceptible to TOL. In 74 (46.8%) of these isolates, non-susceptibility to TOL was explained by the production of at least one carbapenemase. WGS revealed that some isolates carried ESBLs, mutated bla PDC and ampD, associated with decreased susceptibility to TOL.Substitutions found in PDC and carbapenemase production were the most common presumed mechanisms of resistance to TOL detected in this study. This study shows that epidemiological surveillance is warranted to monitor the emergence of novel mechanisms of resistance to TOL that might compromise its clinical utility.ConclusionSubstitutions found in PDC and carbapenemase production were the most common presumed mechanisms of resistance to TOL detected in this study. This study shows that epidemiological surveillance is warranted to monitor the emergence of novel mechanisms of resistance to TOL that might compromise its clinical utility.