Prevalence and risk markers of behavior problems among adults with intellectual disabilities: A total population study in Örebro County, Sweden
► Data comprised all adults (n=915) with intellectual disability (ID) in the region. ► Sixty-two percent of the participants had at least one behavior problem. ► Nineteen percent had challenging behaviors. ► The most important risk markers were ID level, autism, and sensory hypersensitivity. The aim...
Saved in:
Published in | Research in developmental disabilities Vol. 34; no. 4; pp. 1346 - 1356 |
---|---|
Main Author | |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
Amsterdam
Elsevier Ltd
01.04.2013
Elsevier |
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
Cover
Loading…
Summary: | ► Data comprised all adults (n=915) with intellectual disability (ID) in the region. ► Sixty-two percent of the participants had at least one behavior problem. ► Nineteen percent had challenging behaviors. ► The most important risk markers were ID level, autism, and sensory hypersensitivity.
The aim of the present study was to investigate the prevalence of behavior problems among people with administratively defined intellectual disability (ID) and identify possible risk markers for behavior problems using the Behavior Problems Inventory (BPI). Sixty-two percent of the ID population (n=915) had a behavior problem (self-injurious, stereotyped, or aggressive/destructive behavior) and 18.7% had a behavior problem identified as challenging behavior, resulting in a prevalence of 80.3 per 100,000 in the base population. The most pronounced risk markers for behavior problems were severity of ID, autism, night sleep disturbances, sensory hypersensitivity, communication dysfunction, social deficits, psychiatry involvement, and psychotropic medication. About 50% of people with behavior problems were on psychotropic drugs. Protective markers were Down's syndrome and, to some extent, cerebral palsy. The results were largely consistent with those reported in previous studies. Findings not previously reported were that prevalence of aggressive/destructive behavior peaked among those ≥70 years. Highlighting groups within a population at particular risk has implications for management and treatment of individuals with behavior problems. |
---|---|
Bibliography: | ObjectType-Article-1 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 content type line 23 |
ISSN: | 0891-4222 1873-3379 1873-3379 |
DOI: | 10.1016/j.ridd.2013.01.010 |