Cochlear duct length–one size fits all?

• Published in: American journal of otolaryngology Vol. 38; no. 2; pp. 218 - 221
• Main Authors: Thong, JF, Low, D, Tham, A, Liew, C, Tan, TY, Yuen, HW
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: United States Elsevier Inc 01.03.2017; Elsevier Limited
• Subjects: Adolescent; Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Asian people; Child; China; Cochlea; Cochlea - anatomy & histology; Cochlea - diagnostic imaging; Cochlear implants; Computed tomography; Ear; Ears & hearing; Electrodes; Ethnic Groups; Female; Females; Gender; Humans; India; Insertion; Malaysia; Male; Males; Middle Aged; Otolaryngology; Sex Factors; Surgery; Temporal bone; Temporal Bone - anatomy & histology; Temporal Bone - diagnostic imaging; Tomography, X-Ray Computed - methods; Transplants & implants; Variation
• ISSN: 0196-0709; 1532-818X
• DOI: 10.1016/j.amjoto.2017.01.015

Abstract Objective Recent studies demonstrated the utility of high-resolution computed tomography (HRCT) scans in measuring basal cochlear length and cochlear insertion depths. These studies showed significant variations in the anatomy of the cochlea amongst humans. The aim of our study was to investigate for gender and racial variations in the basal turn length of the human cochlea in an Asian population. Method HRCT temporal bone data from year 1997 till 2012 of patients with normally developed cochleae who reported with otologic disease was obtained. Reconstruction of the full basal turn was performed for both ears. The largest distance from the midpoint of the round window, through the midmodiolar axis, to the lateral wall was measured (distance A ). Length of the lateral wall of the cochlea to the first turn (360°) was calculated and statistically analyzed. Results HRCT temporal bone data from 161 patients was initially obtained. Four patients were subsequently excluded from the study as they were of various other racial groups. Study group therefore comprised of 157 patients (314 cochleae). Mean distance A was statistically different between the two sides of the ear (right 9.09 mm; left 9.06 mm; p = 0.0069). Significant gender and racial differences were also found. Mean distance A was 9.17 mm in males and 8.97 mm in females ( p = 0.0016). The racial groups were Chinese (39%), Malay (38%) and Indian (22%). Between racial groups, mean distance A was 9.11 mm (Chinese), 9.11 mm (Malays) and 8.99 mm (Indians). The mean basal turn lengths ranged from 19.71 mm to 25.09 mm. With gender factored in, significant variation in mean basal turn lengths was found across all three racial groups ( p = 0.04). Conclusion The view of the basal turn of the cochlea from HRCT is simple to obtain and reproducible. This study found significant differences in basal cochlear length amongst male and female Asian patients, as well as amongst various racial groups. This has implications for cochlear electrode insertion as well as electrode array design.