Evaluation of Truck Cab Decontamination Procedures following Inoculation with Porcine Epidemic Diarrhea Virus and Porcine Reproductive and Respiratory Syndrome Virus

• Published in: Animals (Basel) Vol. 14; no. 2; p. 280
• Main Authors: Houston, Grace E, Jones, Cassandra K, Evans, Caitlin, Otott, Haley K, Stark, Charles R, Bai, Jianfa, Poulsen Porter, Elizabeth G, de Almeida, Marcelo N, Zhang, Jianqiang, Gauger, Phillip C, Blomme, Allison K, Woodworth, Jason C, Paulk, Chad B, Gebhardt, Jordan T
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: Switzerland MDPI AG 01.01.2024
• Subjects: Analysis; BCG; BCG vaccines; Biosecurity; Diarrhea; Discount coupons; Disease transmission; disinfectants; Disinfection & disinfectants; Economic impact; Feeds; Hogs; Horticultural industry; Pathogens; porcine epidemic diarrhea virus; Porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome; porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome virus; RNA; Rubber; Soap and cleaning agents industry; Swine; truck cabs; Viruses; Canada; United States; Kansas; United States > US; North America; swine; disinfectants; truck cabs; porcine epidemic diarrhea virus; porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome virus
• ISSN: 2076-2615; 2076-2615
• DOI: 10.3390/ani14020280

This experiment aimed to evaluate commercially available disinfectants and their application methods against porcine epidemic diarrhea virus (PEDV) and porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome virus (PRRSV) on truck cab surfaces. Plastic, fabric, and rubber surfaces inoculated with PEDV or PRRSV were placed in a full-scale truck cab and then treated with one of eight randomly assigned disinfectant treatments. After application, surfaces were environmentally sampled with cotton gauze and tested for PEDV and PRRSV using qPCR duplex analysis. There was a disinfectant × surface interaction ( < 0.0001), indicating a detectable amount of PEDV or PRRSV RNA was impacted by disinfectant treatment and surface material. For rubber surfaces, 10% bleach application had lower detectable amounts of RNA compared to all other treatments ( < 0.05) except Intervention via misting fumigation, which was intermediate. In both fabric and plastic surfaces, there was no evidence ( > 0.05) of a difference in detectable RNA between disinfectant treatments. For disinfectant treatments, fabric surfaces with no chemical treatment had less detectable viral RNA compared to the corresponding plastic and rubber ( < 0.05). Intervention applied via pump sprayer to fabric surfaces had less detectable viral RNA than plastic ( < 0.05). Furthermore, 10% bleach applied via pump sprayer to fabric and rubber surfaces had less detectable viral RNA than plastic ( < 0.05). Also, a 10 h downtime, with no chemical application or gaseous fumigation for 10 h, applied to fabric surfaces had less detectable viral RNA than other surfaces ( < 0.05). Sixteen treatments were evaluated via swine bioassay, but all samples failed to produce infectivity. In summary, commercially available disinfectants successfully reduced detectable viral RNA on surfaces but did not eliminate viral genetic material, highlighting the importance of bioexclusion of pathogens of interest.