A randomized controlled trial of continuous activity, short bouts, and a 10,000 step guideline in inactive adults
Abstract Objective Although several studies have examined the effect of accumulated bouts on health outcomes, the impact of recommending short bouts on activity-related behavior in health promotion efforts has received minimal investigation. Method During this 5-week study in 2007–2008, 43 universit...
Saved in:
Published in | Preventive medicine Vol. 52; no. 2; pp. 120 - 125 |
---|---|
Main Authors | , , , , |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
United States
Elsevier Inc
01.02.2011
|
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
Cover
Loading…
Summary: | Abstract Objective Although several studies have examined the effect of accumulated bouts on health outcomes, the impact of recommending short bouts on activity-related behavior in health promotion efforts has received minimal investigation. Method During this 5-week study in 2007–2008, 43 university employees (8 male, 35 female) in the Southeastern United States were randomly assigned to a group recommended to achieve (a) 10,000 steps (10 K), (b) 30-minutes (30 min) of continuous physical activity, or (c) 30-minutes of activity in bouts of at least 10 minutes (bouts). Results and conclusions Repeated measures ANOVA revealed that the 10 K group showed the largest increase in step counts whereas the bouts group showed the smallest change over the intervention period, p = 0.01. Condition differences were most pronounced on days in which participants met their activity recommendation. Accelerometer results revealed that the 10 K ( d = 1.1) and 30 min groups ( d = 0.89) showed large increases in minutes of moderate to vigorous activity (MVPA), whereas the bouts group showed minimal change ( d = 0.11). Although activity recommendations did not differentially affect self-efficacy, participants from all conditions showed decreased self-efficacy across the intervention ( p = 0.02), highlighting the need to develop strategies to increase self-efficacy in activity promotion efforts. |
---|---|
Bibliography: | ObjectType-Article-2 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-News-1 ObjectType-Feature-3 content type line 23 ObjectType-Article-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 |
ISSN: | 0091-7435 1096-0260 |
DOI: | 10.1016/j.ypmed.2010.12.001 |