The impact of subcutaneous oestradiol implants on biochemical markers of bone turnover and bone mineral density in postmenopausal women
Objective To evaluate the anabolic effect of oestrogen on bone by comparing the response of markers of bone formation (and resorption) and bone mineral density (BMD) to subcutaneous oestradiol implants. Design One year double‐blind placebo controlled randomised study. Setting Clinical research unit...
Saved in:
Published in | BJOG : an international journal of obstetrics and gynaecology Vol. 109; no. 7; pp. 812 - 820 |
---|---|
Main Authors | , , , |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
Oxford, UK
Blackwell Science Ltd
01.07.2002
Blackwell |
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
Cover
Loading…
Summary: | Objective
To evaluate the anabolic effect of oestrogen on bone by comparing the response of markers of bone formation (and resorption) and bone mineral density (BMD) to subcutaneous oestradiol implants.
Design
One year double‐blind placebo controlled randomised study.
Setting
Clinical research unit within a teaching hospital.
Population
Twenty‐one hysterectomised postmenopausal women were randomised to 25 mg oestradiol implants at baseline and at six months or to have a sham procedure at baseline and six months.
Methods
BMD and quantitative ultrasound (QUS) were assessed at baseline and one year. Bone alkaline phosphatase (bone ALP), procollagen type I N‐terminal propeptide (PINP), osteocalcin (OC), free deoxypyridinoline (iFDPD), N‐telopeptide of type I collagen (NTX), serum oestradiol and intact parathyroid hormone (PTH) were measured at baseline, 4, 8, 12 and 24 weeks.
Main outcome measures
Percentage change markers of bone turnover and PTH and change in oestradiol levels over first six months and percentage of changes in DXA and QUS over one year.
Results
PINP, bone ALP and OC increased by 28%, 7% and 9%, respectively (P < 0.01) during the first four weeks of treatment and then decreased significantly. Lumbar spine (LS) and total hip (TH) BMD increased by 5.4% and 6.0% (P < 0.001), respectively, and femoral neck (FN) BMD by 3.7% (P < 0.05) during the first year of treatment compared with control subjects. The peak serum oestradiol level was achieved four weeks after implant insertion. Mean PTH levels increased significantly in subjects receiving subcutaneous oestradiol.
Conclusion
Subcutaneous oestrogen exerted an apparent anabolic effect on bone, which was initially reflected by an increase in bone formation markers and later by a large increase in BMD. |
---|---|
Bibliography: | ObjectType-Article-2 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-1 ObjectType-News-3 content type line 23 |
ISSN: | 1470-0328 1471-0528 |
DOI: | 10.1111/j.1471-0528.2002.01177.x |