Ultrabrief Screens for Detecting Delirium in Postoperative Cognitively Intact Older Adults

The authors' sought to develop an ultrabrief screen for postoperative delirium in cognitively intact patients older than 70 years undergoing major elective surgery. All possible combinations of one‐, two‐ and three‐item screens and their sensitivities, specificities, and 95% confidence interval...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inJournal of hospital medicine Vol. 15; no. 9; pp. 544 - 547
Main Authors Sillner, Andrea Yevchak, Ngo, Long, Jung, Yoojin, Inouye, Sharon K, Boltz, Marie, Leslie, Douglas, Marcantonio, Edward R, Fick, Donna M
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published United States Frontline Medical Communications 01.09.2020
Journal of Hospital Medicine
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:The authors' sought to develop an ultrabrief screen for postoperative delirium in cognitively intact patients older than 70 years undergoing major elective surgery. All possible combinations of one‐, two‐ and three‐item screens and their sensitivities, specificities, and 95% confidence intervals were calculated and compared with the delirium reference standard Confusion Assessment Method (CAM). Among the 560 participants (mean age, 77 years; 58% women), delirium occurred in 134 (24%). We considered 1,100 delirium assessments from postoperative days 1 and 2. The screen with the best overall performance consisted of three items: (1) Patient reports feeling confused, (2) Months of the year backward, and (3) “Does the patient appear sleepy?” with sensitivity of 92% and specificity of 72%. This brief, three‐item screen rules out delirium quickly, identifies a subset of patients who require further testing, and may be an important tool to improve recognition of postoperative delirium.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
Drs Marcantonio and Fick contributed equally as senior authors to this manuscript.
ISSN:1553-5592
1553-5606
DOI:10.12788/jhm.3410