Biases in memory for and use of inconsistent beliefs in stereotyping

Some research has suggested that level of inconsistency of information that invalidates expectancy-based stereotypes or trait labels is one of several moderating variables that determine the memorability and use of inconsistent information (e.g. Rojahn & Pettigrew, 1992). Two experiments were de...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inBritish journal of social psychology Vol. 33 ( Pt 3); p. 243
Main Authors White, Jr, R M, Zsambok, C
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published England 01.09.1994
Subjects
Online AccessGet more information

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Some research has suggested that level of inconsistency of information that invalidates expectancy-based stereotypes or trait labels is one of several moderating variables that determine the memorability and use of inconsistent information (e.g. Rojahn & Pettigrew, 1992). Two experiments were designed to identify variables that moderate memory for and use of counter-stereotypic social-political beliefs that were attributed to a stereotypically identified group. In Expt 1, recall was found to be inversely related to level of inconsistency. In Expt 2, location of counter-stereotypic beliefs within a list and the order of counter-stereotypic beliefs (most-to-least vs. least-to-most inconsistent) determined the form of the relationship between recall and level of inconsistency. When counter-stereotypic beliefs were presented relatively early in a list and were ordered from least-to-most inconsistent, a positive relationship obtained; otherwise, the relationship was negative. Stereotyping was less extreme when counter-stereotypic beliefs were presented early in the least-to-most inconsistent ordering. Cognitive processes that may have produced these sets of findings were discussed.
ISSN:0144-6665
DOI:10.1111/j.2044-8309.1994.tb01023.x