A test of two different revelation effects using forced-choice recognition

• Published in: Psychonomic bulletin & review Vol. 14; no. 6; pp. 1096 - 1100
• Main Authors: MAJOR, Jennifer C, HOCKLEY, William E
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: Austin, TX Psychonomic Society 01.12.2007; Springer Nature B.V
• Subjects: Biological and medical sciences; Choice Behavior; Coercion; Competition; False alarms; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology; Human; Humans; Learning. Memory; Memory; Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry; Psychology. Psychophysiology; Recognition (Psychology); Studies; Vocabulary; Human; Forced choice; Memory; Recognition
• ISSN: 1069-9384; 1531-5320
• DOI: 10.3758/bf03193097

The revelation effect refers to the finding of an increased propensity to classify recognition test probes as old when they are preceded by a problem solving task. Recent research indicates that revelation effects are dissociable based on whether the revelation task involves an item that is the same as o rdifferent than th esubsequently presented recognition probe. Using a two-alternative forced-choice design, we found a revelation effect for both words (Experiment 1) and nonwords (Experiment 2) in the condition where the revealed item was the same as the target item (same revelation condition), but no effect when the revealed item was different than either test alternative (different revelation condition). These results were replicated using a mixed list design containing both words and nonwords (Experiment 3). Results support Verde and Rotello's (2004) two-factor account of the revelation effect, which proposes that changes in memory sensitivity underlie revelation effects in the same revelation condition, and that changes in the decision criterion are responsible in the different revelation condition.