Comparison between C-arm cone beam computed tomography and interventional angiography in transarterial chemoembolization of hepatocellular carcinoma

• Published in: Egyptian Journal of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine Vol. 50; no. 1; pp. 64 - 9
• Main Authors: Diab, Ibraheim Ahmed, Hassanein, Shaimaa Abdel-hamid, Mohamed, Hala Hafez
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: Berlin/Heidelberg Springer Berlin Heidelberg 29.11.2019; Springer; Springer Nature B.V; SpringerOpen
• Subjects: Angiography; Cancer; Carcinoma; Comparative analysis; Cone beam computed tomography; CT imaging; Digital subtraction angiography; Hepatic angiography; Hepatocellular carcinoma; Imaging; Laboratories; Liver; Liver cancer; Medical imaging; Medicine; Medicine & Public Health; Nuclear Medicine; Povidone; Radiology; Veins & arteries; Visualization (Computers); Egypt; Ontario Canada; Canada; Digital subtraction angiography; Hepatocellular carcinoma; Hepatic angiography; Cone beam computed tomography
• ISSN: 0378-603X; 2090-4762
• DOI: 10.1186/s43055-019-0053-4

Background Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is the most common primary hepatic malignancy of adults. One of the established treatment procedures performed worldwide for HCC is transcatheter arterial chemoembolization (TACE). By using conventional angiography in TACE, we can detect and identify the vascular anatomy of the liver through obtaining 2D images. Recently C-arm cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) is introduced for obtaining cross-sectional and three-dimensional (3D) images for better visualization of small tumors and their feeding arteries. Results The number of detected focal lesions by angiography was 51 compared to 87 focal lesion detected by CBCT; of those, 45 and 77 were active lesions by both procedures respectively. For lesions, less than 1 cm CBCT detected 23 lesions while angiography detected only one lesion. Angiography detected 87 feeding arterial branch while cone beam CT-HA detected 130 branches to the same number of target lesion. Feeder tractability and confidence were better by CBCT. Conclusion CBCT is superior to angiography in tumor detectability, detection of lesions less than 1 cm, feeder detection, and feeder traction; however, conventional angiography and DSA are irreplaceable. Thus, combination of CBCT with angiography during TACE produces better results and less complication.