MRI-Based Deep-Learning Method for Determining Glioma MGMT Promoter Methylation Status
( ) promoter methylation confers an improved prognosis and treatment response in gliomas. We developed a deep learning network for determining promoter methylation status using T2 weighted Images (T2WI) only. Brain MR imaging and corresponding genomic information were obtained for 247 subjects from...
Saved in:
Published in | American journal of neuroradiology : AJNR Vol. 42; no. 5; pp. 845 - 852 |
---|---|
Main Authors | , , , , , , , , , , , |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
United States
American Society of Neuroradiology
01.05.2021
|
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
Cover
Loading…
Summary: | (
) promoter methylation confers an improved prognosis and treatment response in gliomas. We developed a deep learning network for determining
promoter methylation status using T2 weighted Images (T2WI) only.
Brain MR imaging and corresponding genomic information were obtained for 247 subjects from The Cancer Imaging Archive and The Cancer Genome Atlas. One hundred sixty-three subjects had a methylated
promoter. A T2WI-only network (
-net) was developed to determine
promoter methylation status and simultaneous single-label tumor segmentation. The network was trained using 3D-dense-UNets. Three-fold cross-validation was performed to generalize the performance of the networks. Dice scores were computed to determine tumor-segmentation accuracy.
The
-net demonstrated a mean cross-validation accuracy of 94.73% across the 3 folds (95.12%, 93.98%, and 95.12%, [SD, 0.66%]) in predicting
methylation status with a sensitivity and specificity of 96.31% [SD, 0.04%] and 91.66% [SD, 2.06%], respectively, and a mean area under the curve of 0.93 [SD, 0.01]. The whole tumor-segmentation mean Dice score was 0.82 [SD, 0.008].
We demonstrate high classification accuracy in predicting
promoter methylation status using only T2WI. Our network surpasses the sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of histologic and molecular methods. This result represents an important milestone toward using MR imaging to predict prognosis and treatment response. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0195-6108 1936-959X |
DOI: | 10.3174/ajnr.a7029 |