The P50 auditory event–evoked potential in adult attention-deficit disorder: comparison with schizophrenia

Background: Attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) and schizophrenia are both conceptualized as disorders of attention. Failure to inhibit the P50 auditory event–evoked response, extensively studied in schizophrenia, could also occur in ADHD patients, if these two illnesses have common unde...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inBiological psychiatry (1969) Vol. 47; no. 11; pp. 969 - 977
Main Authors Olincy, Ann, Ross, Randal G, Harris, Josette G, Young, David A, McAndrews, Mary Ann, Cawthra, Ellen, McRae, Kara A, Sullivan, Bernadette, Adler, Lawrence E, Freedman, Robert
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published New York, NY Elsevier Inc 01.06.2000
Elsevier Science
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text
ISSN0006-3223
1873-2402
DOI10.1016/S0006-3223(00)00239-0

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Background: Attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) and schizophrenia are both conceptualized as disorders of attention. Failure to inhibit the P50 auditory event–evoked response, extensively studied in schizophrenia, could also occur in ADHD patients, if these two illnesses have common underlying neurobiological substrates. Methods: This study examined the inhibition of the P50 auditory event–evoked potential in 16 unmedicated adults with ADHD, 16 schizophrenic outpatients, and 16 normal control subjects. Auditory stimuli were presented in a paired stimulus, conditioning-testing paradigm. Results: The amplitude of initial or conditioning P50 response did not differ between the three groups; however, significant effects of psychiatric diagnosis on the amplitude of the test response and the ratio of the test to the conditioning response amplitudes were observed. Schizophrenic patients’ P50 ratios and test amplitudes were higher than both the ADHD and normal groups. Conclusions: Adults with ADHD do not have the inhibitory deficit seen in patients with schizophrenia, suggesting that the mechanism of attentional disturbance in the two illnesses may be fundamentally different.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-2
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-1
content type line 23
ISSN:0006-3223
1873-2402
DOI:10.1016/S0006-3223(00)00239-0