Neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio in primary mediastinal germ cell tumors: A retrospective analysis of >20 years single institution experience

Objectives: To obtain information on outcome stratified by histology, extent and primary treatment patients’ data with primary malignant mediastinal germ cell tumors treated between 1998 and 2018 were retrospectively analyzed. Methods: The primary treatment for localized malignant mediastinal germ c...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inCurrent problems in cancer Vol. 44; no. 4; p. 100537
Main Authors Géczi, Lajos, Budai, Barna, Polk, Nándor, Fazekas, Fruzsina, Bodrogi, István, Biró, Krisztina
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published United States Elsevier Inc 01.08.2020
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Objectives: To obtain information on outcome stratified by histology, extent and primary treatment patients’ data with primary malignant mediastinal germ cell tumors treated between 1998 and 2018 were retrospectively analyzed. Methods: The primary treatment for localized malignant mediastinal germ cell tumors was neoadjuvant bleomycin + etoposid + cisplatin (BEP) ± surgery (n = 22); or surgery ± adjuvant BEP (n = 16). For disseminated disease (n = 21) first line BEP ± second line chemotherapy were administered. For nonseminomas (NS) the NLR at start of BEP was analyzed in relation to disease-free survival (DFS), progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS). Results: After neoadjuvant treatment the 5-year DFS was 100% for seminomas (S), and 63.4% for NS. The 5-year OS was 100% for S, and 76.9% for NS. The 5-year DFS and OS after surgery ± BEP for S was 72.9% and 100%, for NS was 75% and 87.5%, respectively. The 5-year PFS and OS of metastatic patients for S was 60% and 80%, while the median PFS and OS of NS were 5.7 and 11.1 months, respectively. Objective response (P = 0.006) and low NLR (P = 0.043) were independent prognostic markers of longer OS. Conclusions: We confirmed the good outcome of BEP-treated S, while NS had poorer prognosis. Previously published prognostic models for NS were validated. Based on NLR and response a new prognostic model was developed.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-2
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-1
content type line 23
ISSN:0147-0272
1535-6345
DOI:10.1016/j.currproblcancer.2020.100537