A novel hydrogel‐based moisturizing cream composed of hyaluronic acid for patients with xerosis: An intraindividual comparative analysis

• Published in: Skin research and technology Vol. 29; no. 11; pp. e13499 - n/a
• Main Authors: Ha, Nam Gyoung, Kim, Sang Lim, Lee, Seon Hwa, Lee, Weon Ju
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: England John Wiley & Sons, Inc 01.11.2023; John Wiley and Sons Inc
• Subjects: Adverse events; Comparative analysis; Cosmetics; Effectiveness; efficacy; Emollients; Humans; Hyaluronic Acid; Hydration; Hydrogels; Immunoglobulin A; Irradiation; Lipids; moisturizer; Original; Polymers; Safety; Silicones; Skin; Skin Cream; Wound healing; xerosis; moisturizer; xerosis; safety; efficacy; hyaluronic acid
• ISSN: 0909-752X; 1600-0846; 1600-0846
• DOI: 10.1111/srt.13499

Background Hyaluronic acid (HA) is mainly used to treat xerosis. It also exerts wound‐healing, moisturizing, and antiaging effects. Although HA is considered an effective and safe ingredient in cosmetics, there is a constant demand for a more money‐saving and effective formulation. This study aimed to evaluate the safety and efficacy of a novel hydrogel‐based moisturizer containing HA cross‐linked with silicone polymers, produced solely through irradiation without the use of cross‐linking agents. Materials and Methods A safety study enrolled 30 participants with healthy skin to perform patch and photopatch tests while recording adverse events. For the efficacy study, 30 participants with xerosis were compared before and after using the novel hydrogel, evaluating the cutaneous barrier function, xerosis severity scale (XSS) score, participant's satisfaction, and Investigator's Global Assessment (IGA). Furthermore, the efficacy of the novel hydrogel‐based moisturizer was evaluated by comparing it with a conventional moisturizer, Physiogel, in another 30 participants with xerosis. Results In the safety study, no serious adverse events were observed. In the efficacy study before and after use, skin hydration and skin surface lipid increased (p < 0.05) whereas the XSS scores decreased (p < 0.05) with time. In the comparative efficacy study with Physiogel, skin hydration increased whereas the XSS scores decreased (p < 0.05) over time in both groups. Furthermore, IGA improved in 100% of participants in both groups. Also, 100% and 93% of participants were satisfied with the novel hydrogel‐based moisturizer and Physiogel, respectively. Conclusions The novel hydrogel‐based moisturizer proved to be safe and effective for xerosis, showing comparable results to the conventional moisturizer.