Eight‐year efficacy and safety of tenofovir alafenamide for treatment of chronic hepatitis B virus infection: Final results from two randomised phase 3 trials

Summary Background In two phase 3 studies, tenofovir alafenamide (TAF) showed non‐inferior efficacy versus tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (TDF), with more favourable renal and bone safety in patients with chronic hepatitis B (CHB). Aims Here, we report the studies' final 8‐year results. Methods...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inAlimentary pharmacology & therapeutics Vol. 60; no. 11-12; pp. 1573 - 1586
Main Authors Buti, Maria, Lim, Young‐Suk, Chan, Henry Lik Yuen, Agarwal, Kosh, Marcellin, Patrick, Brunetto, Maurizia R., Chuang, Wan‐Long, Janssen, Harry L. A., Fung, Scott K., Izumi, Namiki, Jablkowski, Maciej S., Abdurakhmanov, Dzhamal, Abramov, Frida, Wang, Hongyuan, Botros, Irina, Yee, Leland J., Mateo, Roberto, Flaherty, John F., Osinusi, Anu, Pan, Calvin Q., Shalimar, X., Seto, Wai‐Kay, Gane, Edward J.
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published England Wiley Subscription Services, Inc 01.12.2024
John Wiley and Sons Inc
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Summary Background In two phase 3 studies, tenofovir alafenamide (TAF) showed non‐inferior efficacy versus tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (TDF), with more favourable renal and bone safety in patients with chronic hepatitis B (CHB). Aims Here, we report the studies' final 8‐year results. Methods CHB patients (hepatitis B e antigen [HBeAg]‐negative and HBeAg‐positive) were randomised (2:1) to double‐blind TAF 25 mg/day or TDF 300 mg/day for up to 3 years, followed by open‐label (OL) TAF through year 8. Virological, biochemical, serological and fibrosis responses, and safety, including bone and renal parameters, were evaluated. Resistance to TAF was assessed annually by deep sequencing of polymerase/reverse transcriptase and by phenotyping. Results Among 1298 patients randomised to double‐blind TAF (n = 866) or double‐blind TDF (n = 432), 775 in the TAF group and 382 in the TDF group received OL TAF, including 180 and 202 who switched from TDF to TAF at year 2 (TDF2y → TAF6y) or year 3 (TDF3y → TAF5y), respectively. At year 8, among patients in the TAF8y, TDF2y → TAF6y and TDF3y → TAF5y groups, 69%, 66% and 73% (missing‐equals‐failure analysis) and 95%, 94% and 97% (missing‐equals‐excluded) of patients, respectively, achieved HBV DNA <29 IU/mL. Estimated glomerular filtration rate (Cockcroft‐Gault method; eGFRCG) and hip/spine bone mineral density (BMD) remained stable in patients receiving double‐blind/OL TAF, with only small declines at year 8. Decreases in eGFRCG and hip/spine BMD observed during double‐blind TDF improved after switching to OL TAF. No patients developed resistance to TAF. Conclusion Long‐term TAF treatment exhibited favourable safety and tolerability with high rates of viral suppression and no development of resistance. ClinicalTrials.gov numbers NCT01940341 and NCT01940471. In patients with CHB, long‐term treatment with TAF, or with TDF followed by TAF, exhibited favourable safety and tolerability with high rates of viral suppression. No resistance to TAF was detected.
Bibliography:The Handling Editor for this article was Dr Colin Howden, and it was accepted for publication after full peer‐review.
ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 14
content type line 23
ObjectType-Undefined-3
ISSN:0269-2813
1365-2036
1365-2036
DOI:10.1111/apt.18278