The modern reverse shoulder arthroplasty and an updated systematic review for each complication: part I

Globally, reverse shoulder arthroplasty (RSA) has moved away from the Grammont design to modern prosthesis designs. The purpose of this 2-part study was to systematically review each of the most common complications of RSA, limiting each search to publications in 2010 or later. In this part (part I)...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inJSES international Vol. 4; no. 4; pp. 929 - 943
Main Authors Shah, Sarav S., Gaal, Benjamin T., Roche, Alexander M., Namdari, Surena, Grawe, Brian M., Lawler, Macy, Dalton, Stewart, King, Joseph J., Helmkamp, Joshua, Garrigues, Grant E., Wright, Thomas W., Schoch, Bradley S., Flik, Kyle, Otto, Randall J., Jones, Richard, Jawa, Andrew, McCann, Peter, Abboud, Joseph, Horneff, Gabe, Ross, Glen, Friedman, Richard, Ricchetti, Eric T., Boardman, Douglas, Tashjian, Robert Z., Gulotta, Lawrence V.
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published United States Elsevier Inc 01.12.2020
Elsevier
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Globally, reverse shoulder arthroplasty (RSA) has moved away from the Grammont design to modern prosthesis designs. The purpose of this 2-part study was to systematically review each of the most common complications of RSA, limiting each search to publications in 2010 or later. In this part (part I), we examined (1) scapular notching (SN), (2) periprosthetic infection (PJI), (3) mechanical failure (glenoid or humeral component), and (4) neurologic injury (NI). Four separate PubMed database searches were performed following Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses guidelines. Overall, 113 studies on SN, 62 on PJI, 34 on mechanical failure, and 48 on NI were included in our reviews. Univariate analysis was performed with the χ2 or Fisher exact test. The Grammont design had a higher SN rate vs. all other designs combined (42.5% vs. 12.3%, P < .001). The onlay humeral design had a lower rate than the lateralized glenoid design (10.5% vs. 14.8%, P < .001). The PJI rate was 2.4% for primary RSA and 2.6% for revision RSA. The incidence of glenoid and humeral component loosening was 2.3% and 1.4%, respectively. The Grammont design had an increased NI rate vs. all other designs combined (0.9% vs. 0.1%, P = .04). Focused systematic reviews of the recent literature with a large volume of RSAs demonstrate that with the use of non-Grammont modern prosthesis designs, complications including SN, PJI, glenoid component loosening, and NI are significantly reduced compared with previous studies. As the indications for RSA continue to expand, it is imperative to accurately track the rates and types of complications to justify its cost and increased indications.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-2
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-3
content type line 23
ObjectType-Review-1
ISSN:2666-6383
2666-6383
DOI:10.1016/j.jseint.2020.07.017