Variables influencing manometric parameters of deglutitive and non‐deglutitive upper esophageal sphincter: A study of 89 asymptomatic participants
Background High‐resolution manometry overcomes limitations imposed by axial and radial asymmetry as well as swallow and respiration‐induced movement of the upper esophageal sphincter (UES), allowing for its reliable use in evaluation of dysphagic and reflux patients. The aim of this study was to det...
Saved in:
Published in | Neurogastroenterology and motility Vol. 34; no. 2; pp. e14175 - n/a |
---|---|
Main Authors | , , , , , , |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
England
Wiley Subscription Services, Inc
01.02.2022
|
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
Cover
Loading…
Summary: | Background
High‐resolution manometry overcomes limitations imposed by axial and radial asymmetry as well as swallow and respiration‐induced movement of the upper esophageal sphincter (UES), allowing for its reliable use in evaluation of dysphagic and reflux patients. The aim of this study was to determine normative values and their variability across position, sex, age, height, weight, BMI, and volume for clinically relevant deglutitive and non‐deglutitive UES parameters.
Methods
We studied 89 asymptomatic volunteers age 19–90 years, (45 female) during 3–10 repetitions of dry, 5 and 10 ml water swallows at 30‐s intervals using high‐resolution manometry.
Key Results
Upper esophageal sphincter high‐pressure zone was longer in men than women and in supine than upright position. UES basal contractile integral and mean basal pressure were higher in supine compared to upright; higher in men than women, inversely correlated with age, correlated positively with height and with weight in the supine position only. UES relaxation duration was longer in upright than in supine position but not affected by age, sex, height, weight, or BMI. It was longer with 5 and 10 ml compared with dry swallows. UES minimum/nadir relaxation and mean relaxation pressures were lower in upright than supine position, increased with increase in age and were higher in men than women.
Conclusions and Inferences
Position, sex, age, height, weight, and volume affect some deglutitive and non‐deglutitve UES manometric parameters. BMI does not affect the studied manometric parameters. These effects should be taken into consideration in clinical evaluation of UES.
Upper esophageal sphincter (UES) plays a pivotal role in swallowing and normal UES function is essential for prevention of dysphagia. This study suggests that UES is impacted by several variables that should be taken into consideration when assessing UES function by high‐resolution manometry. Normative values presented in this study are also relevant to defining abnormal UES function in diseased states. |
---|---|
Bibliography: | Funding information Supported in part by NIH Grant P01DK068051 and T32DK061923 ObjectType-Article-1 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 content type line 23 Francis Edeani had a major role in the study concept and design, acquisition of data, analysis and interpretation of data, drafting of the manuscript, critical revision of the manuscript, statistical analysis, technical or material support and study supervision; Mark Kern had a major role in the study concept and design, analysis and interpretation of data, critical revision of the manuscript, statistical analysis, and study supervision; Kenan Ulualp has a major role in acquisition of data, Karlo Kovacic had a major role in the acquisition of data, technical or material support; Patrick Sanvanson had a major role in analysis and interpretation of data, critical revision of the manuscript, and study supervision, Ling Mei had a major role in drafting of the manuscript, critical revision of the manuscript, and study supervision, Reza Shaker has a major role in study concept and design, analysis and interpretation of data, drafting of the manuscript, critical revision of the manuscript, obtained funding, and study supervision. AUTHOR CONTRIBUTION |
ISSN: | 1350-1925 1365-2982 |
DOI: | 10.1111/nmo.14175 |