Effects of pair housing on behavior, cortisol, and clinical outcomes during quarantine‐like procedures for rhesus macaques (Macaca mulatta)

Background Compatible pair housing of macaques in research settings increases species‐typical behaviors and facilitates beneficial social buffering. It is not yet established whether these benefits are maintained after intrafacility transfer and domestic quarantine, which are two stressors that can...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inJournal of medical primatology Vol. 52; no. 2; pp. 108 - 120
Main Authors Jackson, Martina N., Truelove, Melissa A., Williams, Kimberly, Chen, Jiandong, Moore, Reneé H., Wood, Jennifer S., Cohen, Joyce K., Mollie, Bloomsmith
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Denmark Wiley Subscription Services, Inc 01.04.2023
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Background Compatible pair housing of macaques in research settings increases species‐typical behaviors and facilitates beneficial social buffering. It is not yet established whether these benefits are maintained after intrafacility transfer and domestic quarantine, which are two stressors that can lead to behavioral and clinical abnormalities. Methods We evaluated 40 adolescent male rhesus macaques who were single‐ or pair‐housed immediately following an intrafacility transfer. We measured behavior, fecal cortisol, body weight, and diarrhea occurrence. Body weight and diarrhea occurrence were also retrospectively analyzed in an additional 120 adolescent rhesus who underwent a similar transfer. Results and Conclusions Pair‐housed macaques exhibited less of some undesirable behaviors (e.g., self‐clasping) and experienced less diarrhea than single‐housed subjects; however, no significant differences in cortisol levels or alopecia measures were found. The demonstrated beneficial effects of pair housing for rhesus macaques following intrafacility transfer and adjustment suggest pairing upon arrival at a new facility will bolster animal welfare.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 14
content type line 23
Current author institution: Division of Comparative Medicine, Massachusetts Institute of Technology Cambridge MA, United States
ISSN:0047-2565
1600-0684
1600-0684
DOI:10.1111/jmp.12635