Guided Insertion of the ProSeal Laryngeal Mask Airway Is Superior to Conventional Tracheal Intubation by First-Month Anesthesia Residents After Brief Manikin-Only Training

• Published in: Anesthesia and analgesia Vol. 103; no. 2; pp. 458 - 462
• Main Authors: Hohlrieder, Matthias, Brimacombe, Joseph, von Goedecke, Achim, Keller, Christian
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: Hagerstown, MD International Anesthesia Research Society 01.08.2006; Lippincott
• Subjects: Adolescent; Aged; Anesthesia; Anesthesia. Intensive care medicine. Transfusions. Cell therapy and gene therapy; Anesthesiology - education; Biological and medical sciences; Humans; Internship and Residency; Intubation, Intratracheal - adverse effects; Intubation, Intratracheal - methods; Laryngeal Masks - adverse effects; Laryngoscopy; Medical sciences; Middle Aged; Pilot Projects; Mask; Anesthesia; Intubation
• ISSN: 0003-2999; 1526-7598
• DOI: 10.1213/01.ane.0000223679.14471.6c

In the following pilot study, we compared conventional laryngoscope-guided tracheal intubation (tracheal intubation) and laryngoscope-guided, gum elastic bougie-guided ProSeal laryngeal mask airway insertion (guided ProSeal) for airway management by first-month anesthesia residents after brief manikin-only training. Five first-month residents with no practical experience of airway management were observed performing these techniques in 200 ASA I–II anesthetized, paralyzed adults. Each resident managed 40 patients, 20 in each group, in random order. The number of insertion attempts, effective airway time, ventilatory capability during pressure-controlled ventilation set at 15 cm H2O, airway trauma, and skill acquisition were studied. Data were collected by unblinded observers. Insertion was more frequently successful (100% versus 65%) and effective airway time was shorter (41 ± 24 s versus 89 ± 62 s) in the guided ProSeal group (both P < 0.0001). Expired tidal volume was larger (730 ± 170 mL versus 560 ± 140 mL) and end-tidal CO2 lower (33 ± 4 mm Hg versus 37 ± 5 mm Hg) in the guided ProSeal group during pressure controlled ventilation (both P < 0.0001). Blood staining was more frequent on the laryngoscope (24% versus 2%; P < 0.0001) in the tracheal intubation group. There was evidence for skill acquisition in both groups. We conclude that laryngoscope-guided, gum elastic bougie-guided insertion of the ProSeal laryngeal mask airway is superior to conventional laryngoscope-guided tracheal intubation for airway management in terms of insertion success, expired tidal volume, and airway trauma by first-month anesthesia residents after brief manikin-only training. The guided ProSeal technique has potential for cardiopulmonary resuscitation by novices when conventional intubation fails.