Efficacy of pharmacologic treatment in tinnitus patients without specific or treatable origin: A network meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials

Although tinnitus has a prevalence between 20 and 42.8%, the currently recommended management for tinnitus, such as tinnitus support and psychologic therapies, are relatively time-consuming and expensive. Several new pharmacologic treatments designed for tinnitus patients without specific origin had...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inEClinicalMedicine Vol. 39; p. 101080
Main Authors Chen, Jiann-Jy, Chen, Yen-Wen, Zeng, Bing-Yan, Hung, Chao-Ming, Zeng, Bing-Syuan, Stubbs, Brendon, Carvalho, Andre F., Thompson, Trevor, Roerecke, Michael, Su, Kuan-Pin, Tu, Yu-Kang, Wu, Yi-Cheng, Smith, Lee, Chen, Tien-Yu, Lin, Pao-Yen, Liang, Chih-Sung, Hsu, Chih-Wei, Hsu, Shih-Pin, Kuo, Hung-Chang, Wu, Ming-Kung, Tseng, Ping-Tao
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published England Elsevier Ltd 01.09.2021
Elsevier
Subjects
PAR
TRA
ALP
VES
CHL
VAR
CLO
VAS
TRI
AMI
Gab
SMD
Gin
NOR
Car
Mel
MIS
Met
RR
KRG
SER
RCT
PLA
THI
ClD
ACA
NMA
Bet
DEX
Pen
PIR
NER
OXC
PRA
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Although tinnitus has a prevalence between 20 and 42.8%, the currently recommended management for tinnitus, such as tinnitus support and psychologic therapies, are relatively time-consuming and expensive. Several new pharmacologic treatments designed for tinnitus patients without specific origin had been developed but their efficacy remains unclear. The current Network Meta-Analysis (NMA) of randomised controlled trials (RCTs) was conducted to evaluate the efficacy of different pharmacologic treatments for tinnitus management in tinnitus patients without specific or treatable origin (i.e. primary tinnitus). Databases were searched from inception to April 5th, 2021. All network meta-analytic procedures were conducted under the frequentist model. We calculated the effect size of outcomes with different rating scales with standardized mean difference. PROSPERO registration: CRD42020177742. Overall, 36 RCTs were included with 2,761 participants. The main results revealed that pharmacologic interventions with brain-acting effect (for example, amitriptyline, acamprosate, and gabapentin) and those with anti-inflammation/anti-oxidant effect (for example, intra-tympanic dexamethasone injection plus oral melatonin) were associated with superior improvement in tinnitus severity and response rate compared to placebo/control. Oral amitriptyline were associated with the highest improvement in tinnitus severity and the fourth highest response rate. None of the investigated interventions was associated with different changes in quality of life compared to placebo/control. All the investigated treatments were associated with similar drop-out rate to placebo/control. The current NMA suggests a potential role for treatments with brain-acting effect (for example, amitriptyline, acamprosate, and gabapentin) or anti-inflammation/anti-oxidant effect (for example, intra-tympanic dexamethasone injection plus oral melatonin) as the preferable effective treatments for tinnitus without specific or treatable origin. none.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
contributed equally as first author
ISSN:2589-5370
2589-5370
DOI:10.1016/j.eclinm.2021.101080