Exploration of joint redundancy but not task space variability facilitates supervised motor learning

The number of joints and muscles in a human arm is more than what is required for reaching to a desired point in 3D space. Although previous studies have emphasized how such redundancy and the associated flexibility may play an important role in path planning, control of noise, and optimization of m...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences - PNAS Vol. 113; no. 50; pp. 14414 - 14419
Main Authors Singh, Puneet, Jana, Sumitash, Ghosal, Ashitava, Murthy, Aditya
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published United States National Academy of Sciences 13.12.2016
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:The number of joints and muscles in a human arm is more than what is required for reaching to a desired point in 3D space. Although previous studies have emphasized how such redundancy and the associated flexibility may play an important role in path planning, control of noise, and optimization of motion, whether and how redundancy might promote motor learning has not been investigated. In this work, we quantify redundancy space and investigate its significance and effect on motor learning. We propose that a larger redundancy space leads to faster learning across subjects. We observed this pattern in subjects learning novel kinematics (visuomotor adaptation) and dynamics (force-field adaptation). Interestingly, we also observed differences in the redundancy space between the dominant hand and nondominant hand that explained differences in the learning of dynamics. Taken together, these results provide support for the hypothesis that redundancy aids in motor learning and that the redundant component of motor variability is not noise.
Bibliography:SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-1
content type line 14
ObjectType-Article-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
Edited by Michael E. Goldberg, Columbia University College of Physicians, New York, NY, and approved October 27, 2016 (received for review August 15, 2016)
Author contributions: P.S., S.J., A.G., and A.M. designed research; P.S. and S.J. performed research; P.S., A.G., and A.M. contributed new reagents/analytic tools; P.S. analyzed data; and P.S., A.G., and A.M. wrote the paper.
ISSN:0027-8424
1091-6490
DOI:10.1073/pnas.1613383113