Pre- versus Post-synaptic Forms of LTP in Two Branches of the Same Hippocampal Afferent

• Published in: The Journal of neuroscience Vol. 44; no. 10; p. e1449232024
• Main Authors: Quintanilla, J, Jia, Y, Pruess, B S, Chavez, J, Gall, C M, Lynch, G, Gunn, B G
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: United States Society for Neuroscience 06.03.2024
• Subjects: Actin; Animals; Cannabinoid receptors; Cannabinoids; Dentate gyrus; Dentate Gyrus - physiology; Electric Stimulation - methods; Excitatory Postsynaptic Potentials - physiology; Glutamatergic transmission; Hippocampus; Hippocampus - metabolism; Long-term potentiation; Long-Term Potentiation - physiology; Male; Mice; Neuronal Plasticity - physiology; Paired-pulse facilitation; Receptors; Sensory neurons; Synaptic plasticity; endocannabinoid; CA3; hippocampus; lateral perforant path; frequency facilitation; long-term potentiation; simulations
• ISSN: 0270-6474; 1529-2401; 1529-2401
• DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1449-23.2024

There has been considerable controversy about pre- versus postsynaptic expression of memory-related long-term potentiation (LTP), with corresponding disputes about underlying mechanisms. We report here an instance in male mice, in which both types of potentiation are expressed but in separate branches of the same hippocampal afferent. Induction of LTP in the dentate gyrus (DG) branch of the lateral perforant path (LPP) reduces paired-pulse facilitation, is blocked by antagonism of cannabinoid receptor type 1, and is not affected by suppression of postsynaptic actin polymerization. These observations are consistent with presynaptic expression. The opposite pattern of results was obtained in the LPP branch that innervates the distal dendrites of CA3: LTP did not reduce paired-pulse facilitation, was unaffected by the cannabinoid receptor blocker, and required postsynaptic actin filament assembly. Differences in the two LPP termination sites were also noted for frequency facilitation of synaptic responses, an effect that was reproduced in a two-step simulation by small adjustments to vesicle release dynamics. These results indicate that different types of glutamatergic neurons impose different forms of filtering and synaptic plasticity on their afferents. They also suggest that inputs are routed to, and encoded by, different sites within the hippocampus depending upon the pattern of activity arriving over the parent axon.