Phase Angle as a Risk Factor for Mortality in Patients Undergoing Peritoneal Dialysis

• Published in: Nutrients Vol. 15; no. 23; p. 4991
• Main Authors: Kang, Seok-Hui, Do, Jun-Young
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: Switzerland MDPI AG 01.12.2023
• Subjects: Age; Comorbidity; Creatinine; Diabetes; Dialysate; Hemodialysis; Hospitals; Humans; Kidney diseases; Kidney Failure, Chronic - etiology; Kidney transplants; Medical research; Medicine, Experimental; Mortality; patient survival; Patients; Peritoneal dialysis; Peritoneal Dialysis - adverse effects; phase angle; Phosphatase; Potassium; Proteins; Regression analysis; Renal replacement therapy; Retrospective Studies; Risk Factors; Survival Rate; technique survival; Urine; Variables; peritoneal dialysis; phase angle; patient survival; technique survival
• ISSN: 2072-6643; 2072-6643
• DOI: 10.3390/nu15234991

Phase angle (PhA) is measured using bioimpedance analysis and calculated using body reactance and resistance in the waveform at 50 kHz. Further studies are necessary to clarify the predictive efficacy of PhA in the mortality of peritoneal dialysis (PD) patients. The objective of this study was to assess the utility of PhA for predicting patient mortality and technique failure and compare the predictability of PhA with other risk factors. Our study had a retrospective cohort design. Our center routinely evaluates bioimpedance measurements for all prevalent PD patients ( = 199). The PhA was measured using multifrequency bioimpedance analysis. Our study evaluated patient and technique survival. There were 66, 68, and 65 patients in the low, middle, and high tertiles of PhA, respectively. The PhA values of the low, middle, and high tertiles were 3.6° (3.4-3.9), 4.4° (4.2-4.7), and 5.5° (5.2-6.0), respectively. The 5-year patient survival rates for the high, middle, and low tertiles were 100%, 81.7%, 69.9%, respectively ( < 0.001). The 5 year technique survival rates for the high, middle, and low tertiles were 91.9%, 74.8%, 63.7%, respectively ( = 0.004). Patient and technique survival increased as the PhA tertiles increased. Both univariate and multivariate Cox regression analyses demonstrated a consistent pattern. The prediction of patient or technique survival was better in PhA than in the other classical indicators. The present study demonstrated that PhA may be an effective indicator for predicting patient or technique survival in PD patients. Furthermore, it suggests that routine measurement of PhA and pre-emptive intervention to recover PhA according to causes of low PhA may help improve patient or technique survival in PD patients.