Dissociable Contributions of Basolateral Amygdala and Ventrolateral Orbitofrontal Cortex to Flexible Learning Under Uncertainty

Reversal learning measures the ability to form flexible associations between choice outcomes with stimuli and actions that precede them. This type of learning is thought to rely on several cortical and subcortical areas, including the highly interconnected orbitofrontal cortex (OFC) and basolateral...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inThe Journal of neuroscience Vol. 44; no. 2; p. e0622232023
Main Authors Aguirre, C. G., Woo, J. H., Romero-Sosa, J. L., Rivera, Z. M., Tejada, A. N., Munier, J. J., Perez, J., Goldfarb, M., Das, K., Gomez, M., Ye, T., Pannu, J., Evans, K., O’Neill, P. R., Spigelman, I., Soltani, A., Izquierdo, A.
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published United States Society for Neuroscience 10.01.2024
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Reversal learning measures the ability to form flexible associations between choice outcomes with stimuli and actions that precede them. This type of learning is thought to rely on several cortical and subcortical areas, including the highly interconnected orbitofrontal cortex (OFC) and basolateral amygdala (BLA), and is often impaired in various neuropsychiatric and substance use disorders. However, the unique contributions of these regions to stimulus- and action-based reversal learning have not been systematically compared using a chemogenetic approach particularly before and after the first reversal that introduces new uncertainty. Here, we examined the roles of ventrolateral OFC (vlOFC) and BLA during reversal learning. Male and female rats were prepared with inhibitory designer receptors exclusively activated by designer drugs targeting projection neurons in these regions and tested on a series of deterministic and probabilistic reversals during which they learned about stimulus identity or side (left or right) associated with different reward probabilities. Using a counterbalanced within-subject design, we inhibited these regions prior to reversal sessions. We assessed initial and pre-/post-reversal changes in performance to measure learning and adjustments to reversals, respectively. We found that inhibition of the ventrolateral orbitofrontal cortex (vlOFC), but not BLA, eliminated adjustments to stimulus-based reversals. Inhibition of BLA, but not vlOFC, selectively impaired action-based probabilistic reversal learning, leaving deterministic reversal learning intact. vlOFC exhibited a sex-dependent role in early adjustment to action-based reversals, but not in overall learning. These results reveal dissociable roles for BLA and vlOFC in flexible learning and highlight a more crucial role for BLA in learning meaningful changes in the reward environment.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 14
content type line 23
C.G.A. and J.H.W. are the co-first authors.
The authors declare no competing financial interests.
This work was supported by UCLA’s Division of Life Sciences Retention Fund (A.I.); National Institutes of Health Grants R01 DA047870 (A.I. and A.S.), R21 MH122800 (A.I. and Blair), R01AA024527 (I.S.), K01 DA042219 (P.O.), and F31 AA028183 (J.M.); the NSF GRFP, Cota-Robles Fellowship, and Charles E. and Sue K. Young Fellowship (C.A.); Ursula Mandel Fellowship and Graduate Research Mentorship Award (J.R.); and the Training Program in Neurotechnology Translation T32 NS115753 (T.Y.). We acknowledge the Staglin Center for Brain and Behavioral Health for additional support related to fluorescence microscopy. We thank P. Ganupuru for his assistance with brain collection. We also thank the NIDA Drug Supply program for the supply of clozapine-N-oxide.
Author contributions: C.G.A. and A.I. designed research; C.G.A., J.L.R-S., Z.M.R., A.N.T., J.J.M., J.P., M.G., K.D., M.G., T.Y., J.P., and K.E. performed research; C.G.A., J.H.W., J.L.R-S., J.J.M., P.R.O., A.S., and A.I. analyzed data; C.G.A., J.H.W., and A.I. wrote the paper.
ISSN:0270-6474
1529-2401
1529-2401
DOI:10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0622-23.2023