Biophysical comparison of ATP synthesis mechanisms shows a kinetic advantage for the rotary process
The ATP synthase (F-ATPase) is a highly complex rotary machine that synthesizes ATP, powered by a proton electrochemical gradient. Why did evolution select such an elaborate mechanism over arguably simpler alternating-access processes that can be reversed to perform ATP synthesis? We studied a syste...
Saved in:
Published in | Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences - PNAS Vol. 113; no. 40; pp. 11220 - 11225 |
---|---|
Main Authors | , , , |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
United States
National Academy of Sciences
04.10.2016
|
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
Cover
Loading…
Summary: | The ATP synthase (F-ATPase) is a highly complex rotary machine that synthesizes ATP, powered by a proton electrochemical gradient. Why did evolution select such an elaborate mechanism over arguably simpler alternating-access processes that can be reversed to perform ATP synthesis? We studied a systematic enumeration of alternative mechanisms, using numerical and theoretical means. When the alternative models are optimized subject to fundamental thermodynamic constraints, they fail to match the kinetic ability of the rotary mechanism over a wide range of conditions, particularly under low-energy conditions. We used a physically interpretable, closed-form solution for the steady-state rate for an arbitrary chemical cycle, which clarifies kinetic effects of complex free-energy landscapes. Our analysis also yields insights into the debated “kinetic equivalence” of ATP synthesis driven by transmembrane pH and potential difference. Overall, our study suggests that the complexity of the F-ATPase may have resulted from positive selection for its kinetic advantage. |
---|---|
Bibliography: | SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-1 content type line 14 ObjectType-Article-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 content type line 23 1R.A. and Z.Z. contributed equally to this work. Author contributions: R.A., Z.Z., and D.M.Z. designed research; R.A., Z.Z., and D.M.Z. performed research; R.A., Z.Z., and R.D.-M. contributed new reagents/analytic tools; R.A., Z.Z., R.D.-M., and D.M.Z. analyzed data; and R.A. and D.M.Z. wrote the paper. 3Present address: OHSU Center for Spatial Systems Biomedicine and Department of Biomedical Engineering, Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, OR 97239. Edited by Ken A. Dill, Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, NY, and approved July 29, 2016 (received for review May 26, 2016) 2Present address: Biomedical Division, Edward Via College of Osteopathic Medicine, Blacksburg, VA 24060. |
ISSN: | 0027-8424 1091-6490 1091-6490 |
DOI: | 10.1073/pnas.1608533113 |