Glycoprotein Matrix Zinc Exhibits Improved Absorption: A Randomized Crossover Trial

Biotransformation of minerals via glycosylation by microorganisms such as yeast and/or probiotics yields nutrients bound to a food matrix, resulting in increased bioavailability. The purpose of this study was to compare the effects of glycoprotein matrix-bound zinc (GPM) on absorption compared to in...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inNutrients Vol. 16; no. 7; p. 1012
Main Authors Jäger, Ralf, Purpura, Martin, Davis, Jaci, Keratsopoulos, Nikolas, Parra, Mandy E, Secrest, Ariane H, Tinsley, Grant M, Taylor, Lem
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Switzerland MDPI AG 30.03.2024
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Biotransformation of minerals via glycosylation by microorganisms such as yeast and/or probiotics yields nutrients bound to a food matrix, resulting in increased bioavailability. The purpose of this study was to compare the effects of glycoprotein matrix-bound zinc (GPM) on absorption compared to inorganic zinc oxide. Sixteen participants ingested 11 mg of zinc as either GPM™ Soy-Free Zinc (GPM, Ashland, Kearny, NJ, USA) or zinc oxide (USP). Blood samples were taken at 0 (i.e., baseline), 30, 60, 90, 120, 180, 240, 300, 360, 420, and 480 min post-ingestion. GPM zinc concentrations were significantly higher at 120 min ( = 0.02; 12.4 ± 5.1 mcg/dL), 180 min ( = 0.002; 16.8 ± 5.1 mcg/dL), and 240 min ( = 0.007; 14.6 ± 5.1 mcg/dL) in comparison to USP zinc oxide. In addition, GPM zinc significantly increased iAUC by 40% (5840 ± 2684 vs. 4183 ± 1132 mcg/dL * 480 min, = 0.02), and Cmax values were 10% higher in GPM compared to USP (148 ± 21 mcg/dL vs. 135 ± 17.5 mcg/dL, = 0.08). Tmax was 12% slower in GPM compared to USP (112.5 ± 38.7 min vs. 127.5 ± 43.1 min); however, differences in Tmax failed to reach statistical significance ( = 0.28). Zinc bound to a glycoprotein matrix significantly increased absorption compared to zinc oxide.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ObjectType-Undefined-3
ISSN:2072-6643
2072-6643
DOI:10.3390/nu16071012