Overlooked roles of DNA damage and maternal age in generating human germline mutations
The textbook view that most germline mutations in mammals arise from replication errors is indirectly supported by the fact that there are both more mutations and more cell divisions in the male than in the female germline. When analyzing large de novo mutation datasets in humans, we find multiple l...
Saved in:
Published in | Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences - PNAS Vol. 116; no. 19; pp. 9491 - 9500 |
---|---|
Main Authors | , , , , , , , |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
United States
National Academy of Sciences
07.05.2019
|
Series | PNAS Plus |
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
Cover
Loading…
Summary: | The textbook view that most germline mutations in mammals arise from replication errors is indirectly supported by the fact that there are both more mutations and more cell divisions in the male than in the female germline. When analyzing large de novo mutation datasets in humans, we find multiple lines of evidence that call that view into question. Notably, despite the drastic increase in the ratio of male to female germ cell divisions after the onset of spermatogenesis, even young fathers contribute three times more mutations than young mothers, and this ratio barely increases with parental age. This surprising finding points to a substantial contribution of damage-induced mutations. Indeed, C-to-G transversions and CpG transitions, which together constitute over one-fourth of all base substitution mutations, show genomic distributions and sex-specific age dependencies indicative of double-strand break repair and methylation-associated damage, respectively. Moreover, we find evidence that maternal age at conception influences the mutation rate both because of the accumulation of damage in oocytes and potentially through an influence on the number of postzygotic mutations in the embryo. These findings reveal underappreciated roles of DNA damage and maternal age in the genesis of human germline mutations. |
---|---|
Bibliography: | ObjectType-Article-1 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 content type line 23 Edited by James A. Birchler, University of Missouri, Columbia, MO, and approved April 2, 2019 (received for review January 23, 2019) Author contributions: Z.G., P.M., G.A., and M.P. designed research; Z.G., P.M., T.A.S., B.S.P., A.R.Q., L.B.J., G.A., and M.P. performed research; Z.G., P.M., T.A.S., B.S.P., G.A., and M.P. analyzed data; A.R.Q. and L.B.J. revised the paper; and Z.G., P.M., G.A., and M.P. wrote the paper. 2G.A. and M.P. contributed equally to this work. |
ISSN: | 0027-8424 1091-6490 1091-6490 |
DOI: | 10.1073/pnas.1901259116 |