Efficiency and safety of radiofrequency-assisted hepatectomy for hepatocellular carcinoma with cirrhosis:A single-center retrospective cohort study

AIM: To assess the efficiency and safety of radiofrequencyassisted hepatectomy in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma(HCC) and cirrhosis.METHODS: From January 2010 to December 2013, 179 patients with HCC and cirrhosis were recruited for this retrospective study. Of these, 100 patients who receive...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inWorld journal of gastroenterology : WJG Vol. 21; no. 35; pp. 10159 - 10165
Main Authors Zhang, Fan, Yan, Jun, Feng, Xiao-Bin, Xia, Feng, Li, Xiao-Wu, Ma, Kuan-Sheng, Bie, Ping
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published United States Baishideng Publishing Group Inc 21.09.2015
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:AIM: To assess the efficiency and safety of radiofrequencyassisted hepatectomy in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma(HCC) and cirrhosis.METHODS: From January 2010 to December 2013, 179 patients with HCC and cirrhosis were recruited for this retrospective study. Of these, 100 patients who received radiofrequency-assisted hepatectomy(RF+ group) were compared to 79 patients who had hepatectomy without ablation(RF- group). The primary endpoint was intraoperative blood loss. The secondary endpoints included liver function, postoperative complications, mortality, and duration of hospital stay.RESULTS: The characteristics of the two groups were closely matched. The Pringle maneuver was not used in the RF+ group. There was significantly less median intraoperative blood loss in the RF+ group(300 vs 400 m L, P = 0.01). On postoperative days(POD) 1 and 5, median alanine aminotransferase was significantly higher in the RF+ group than in the RF- group(POD 1: 348.5 vs 245.5, P = 0.01; POD 5: 112 vs 82.5, P = 0.00), but there was no significant difference between the two groups on POD 3(260 vs 220, P = 0.24). The median AST was significantly higher in the RF+ group on POD 1(446 vs 268, P = 0.00), but there was no significant difference between the two groups on POD 3 and 5(POD 3: 129.5 vs 125, P = 0.65; POD 5: 52.5vs 50, P = 0.10). Overall, the rate of postoperative complications was roughly the same in these two groups(28.0% vs 17.7%, P = 0.11) except that post hepatectomy liver failure was far more common in the RF+ group than in the RF- group(6% vs 0%, P = 0.04).CONCLUSION: Radiofrequency-assisted hepatectomy can reduce intraoperative blood loss during liver resection effectively. However, this method should be used with caution in patients with concomitant cirrhosis because it may cause severe liver damage and liver failure.
Bibliography:AIM: To assess the efficiency and safety of radiofrequencyassisted hepatectomy in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma(HCC) and cirrhosis.METHODS: From January 2010 to December 2013, 179 patients with HCC and cirrhosis were recruited for this retrospective study. Of these, 100 patients who received radiofrequency-assisted hepatectomy(RF+ group) were compared to 79 patients who had hepatectomy without ablation(RF- group). The primary endpoint was intraoperative blood loss. The secondary endpoints included liver function, postoperative complications, mortality, and duration of hospital stay.RESULTS: The characteristics of the two groups were closely matched. The Pringle maneuver was not used in the RF+ group. There was significantly less median intraoperative blood loss in the RF+ group(300 vs 400 m L, P = 0.01). On postoperative days(POD) 1 and 5, median alanine aminotransferase was significantly higher in the RF+ group than in the RF- group(POD 1: 348.5 vs 245.5, P = 0.01; POD 5: 112 vs 82.5, P = 0.00), but there was no significant difference between the two groups on POD 3(260 vs 220, P = 0.24). The median AST was significantly higher in the RF+ group on POD 1(446 vs 268, P = 0.00), but there was no significant difference between the two groups on POD 3 and 5(POD 3: 129.5 vs 125, P = 0.65; POD 5: 52.5vs 50, P = 0.10). Overall, the rate of postoperative complications was roughly the same in these two groups(28.0% vs 17.7%, P = 0.11) except that post hepatectomy liver failure was far more common in the RF+ group than in the RF- group(6% vs 0%, P = 0.04).CONCLUSION: Radiofrequency-assisted hepatectomy can reduce intraoperative blood loss during liver resection effectively. However, this method should be used with caution in patients with concomitant cirrhosis because it may cause severe liver damage and liver failure.
Hepatocellular carcinoma;Blood loss;Radiofrequency
Fan Zhang;Jun Yan;Xiao-Bin Feng;Feng Xia;Xiao-Wu Li;Kuan-Sheng Ma;Ping Bie;Institute of Hepatobiliary Surgery,Southwest Hospital,the Third Military Medical University
ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
Author contributions: Ma KS and Bie P designed the study; Feng XB, Xia F and Li XW performed the study and collected all patient materials; Yan J was responsible for the statistical analysis and edited the manuscript; Zhang F participated in the entire study and composed the manuscript.
Correspondence to: Kuan-Sheng Ma, MD, Professor, Institute of Hepatobiliary Surgery, Southwest Hospital, the Third Military Medical University, No. 30, Gaotanyan, Chongqing 400038, China. makuansheng@vip.sina.com
Telephone: +86-23-68765812 Fax: +86-23-68765812
ISSN:1007-9327
2219-2840
DOI:10.3748/wjg.v21.i35.10159