Nucleotide excision repair removes thymidine analog 5-ethynyl-2′-deoxyuridine from the mammalian genome
Nucleotide excision repair is the principal mechanism for removing bulky DNA adducts from the mammalian genome, including those induced by environmental carcinogens such as UV radiation, and anticancer drugs such as cisplatin. Surprisingly, we found that the widely used thymidine analog EdU is a sub...
Saved in:
Published in | Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences - PNAS Vol. 119; no. 35; pp. 1 - 8 |
---|---|
Main Authors | , , , , , , , |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
United States
National Academy of Sciences
30.08.2022
|
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
Cover
Loading…
Summary: | Nucleotide excision repair is the principal mechanism for removing bulky DNA adducts from the mammalian genome, including those induced by environmental carcinogens such as UV radiation, and anticancer drugs such as cisplatin. Surprisingly, we found that the widely used thymidine analog EdU is a substrate for excision repair when incorporated into the DNA of replicating cells. A number of thymidine analogs were tested, and only EdU was a substrate for excision repair. EdU excision was absent in repair-deficient cells, and in vitro, DNA duplexes bearing EdU were also substrates for excision by mammalian cell-free extracts. We used the excision repair sequencing (XR-seq) method to map EdU repair in the human genome at single-nucleotide resolution and observed that EdU was excised throughout the genome and was subject to transcription-coupled repair as evidenced by higher repair rates in the transcribed strand (TS) relative to the nontranscribed strand (NTS) in transcriptionally active genes. These properties of EdU, combined with its cellular toxicity and ability to cross the blood–brain barrier, make it a potential candidate for treating cancers of the brain, a tissue that typically demonstrates limited replication in adults. |
---|---|
Bibliography: | ObjectType-Article-1 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 content type line 14 content type line 23 1L.W., X.C., and Y.Y. contributed equally to this work. Author contributions: L.W. and A.S. conceived the study; L.W., L.A.L.-B., C.P.S., and A.S. designed research; L.W., X.C., C.K., and H.K. performed research; L.W. performed in vivo excision assay with BrdU antibody, slot blot, and XR-seq; X.C. performed in vivo excision assay with TFIIH and thymidine analog screening; C.K. performed in vitro excision assay with synthesized nucleotides; H.K. optimized click reaction; Y.Y. analyzed data; L.W., L.A.L.-B., C.P.S., and A.S. wrote the paper, with input from all of the authors; and L.A.L.-B., C.P.S., and A.S. supervised the project. Contributed by Aziz Sancar; received June 13, 2022; accepted July 12, 2022; reviewed by Timothy J. Mitchison, Steven A. Roberts, and Stephen T. Keir |
ISSN: | 0027-8424 1091-6490 1091-6490 |
DOI: | 10.1073/pnas.2210176119 |