Divisive normalization unifies disparate response signatures throughout the human visual hierarchy

Neural processing is hypothesized to apply the same mathematical operations in a variety of contexts, implementing so-called canonical neural computations. Divisive normalization (DN) is considered a prime candidate for a canonical computation. Here, we propose a population receptive field (pRF) mod...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences - PNAS Vol. 118; no. 46; pp. 1 - 10
Main Authors Aqil, Marco, Knapen, Tomas, Dumoulin, Serge O.
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published United States National Academy of Sciences 16.11.2021
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Neural processing is hypothesized to apply the same mathematical operations in a variety of contexts, implementing so-called canonical neural computations. Divisive normalization (DN) is considered a prime candidate for a canonical computation. Here, we propose a population receptive field (pRF) model based on DN and evaluate it using ultra-high-field functional MRI (fMRI). The DN model parsimoniously captures seemingly disparate response signatures with a single computation, superseding existing pRF models in both performance and biological plausibility. We observe systematic variations in specific DN model parameters across the visual hierarchy and show how they relate to differences in response modulation and visuospatial information integration. The DN model delivers a unifying framework for visuospatial responses throughout the human visual hierarchy and provides insights into its underlying information-encoding computations. These findings extend the role of DN as a canonical computation to neuronal populations throughout the human visual hierarchy.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
Author contributions: M.A., T.K., and S.O.D. designed research; M.A. and T.K. performed research; M.A. and T.K. contributed new reagents/analytic tools; M.A. analyzed data; and M.A., T.K., and S.O.D. wrote the paper.
Edited by Marisa Carrasco, New York University, New York, NY, and approved October 1, 2021 (received for review May 10, 2021)
ISSN:0027-8424
1091-6490
DOI:10.1073/pnas.2108713118