Two PKA RIα holoenzyme states define ATP as an isoform-specific orthosteric inhibitor that competes with the allosteric activator, cAMP

Protein kinase A (PKA) holoenzyme, comprised of a cAMP-binding regulatory (R)-subunit dimer and 2 catalytic (C)-subunits, is the master switch for cAMP-mediated signaling. Of the 4 R-subunits (RIα, RIβ, RIIα, RIIβ), RIα is most essential for regulating PKA activity in cells. Our 2 RIα₂C₂ holoenzyme...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences - PNAS Vol. 116; no. 33; pp. 16347 - 16356
Main Authors Lu, Tsan-Wen, Wu, Jian, Aoto, Phillip C., Weng, Jui-Hung, Ahuja, Lalima G., Sun, Nicholas, Cheng, Cecilia Y., Zhang, Ping, Taylor, Susan S.
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published United States National Academy of Sciences 13.08.2019
SeriesPNAS Plus
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Protein kinase A (PKA) holoenzyme, comprised of a cAMP-binding regulatory (R)-subunit dimer and 2 catalytic (C)-subunits, is the master switch for cAMP-mediated signaling. Of the 4 R-subunits (RIα, RIβ, RIIα, RIIβ), RIα is most essential for regulating PKA activity in cells. Our 2 RIα₂C₂ holoenzyme states, which show different conformations with and without ATP, reveal how ATP/Mg2+ functions as a negative orthosteric modulator. Biochemical studies demonstrate how the removal of ATP primes the holoenzyme for cAMP-mediated activation. The opposing competition between ATP/cAMP is unique to RIα. In RIIβ, ATP serves as a substrate and facilitates cAMP-activation. The isoform-specific RI-holoenzyme dimer interface mediated by N3A–N3A′ motifs defines multidomain cross-talk and an allosteric network that creates competing roles for ATP and cAMP. Comparisons to the RIIβ holoenzyme demonstrate isoform-specific holoenzyme interfaces and highlights distinct allosteric mechanisms for activation in addition to the structural diversity of the isoforms.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
Reviewers: N.J., University of California, San Francisco; and N.M.L., University of Minnesota.
Author contributions: T.-W.L. designed research; T.-W.L., J.W., P.C.A., L.G.A., N.S., C.Y.C., and P.Z. performed research; T.-W.L., J.W., P.C.A., J.-H.W., L.G.A., C.Y.C., and S.S.T. analyzed data; and T.-W.L. and S.S.T. wrote the paper.
1J.W. and P.C.A. contributed equally to this work.
2Present address: Schrödinger, LLC, San Diego, CA 92121.
Contributed by Susan S. Taylor, June 21, 2019 (sent for review April 10, 2019; reviewed by Natalia Jura and Nicholas M. Levinson)
ISSN:0027-8424
1091-6490
DOI:10.1073/pnas.1906036116