Differential inhibition of pyramidal cells and inhibitory interneurons along the rostrocaudal axis of anterior piriform cortex
The spatial representation of stimuli in sensory neocortices provides a scaffold for elucidating circuit mechanisms underlying sensory processing. However, the anterior piriform cortex (APC) lacks topology for odor identity as well as afferent and intracortical excitation. Consequently, olfactory pr...
Saved in:
Published in | Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences - PNAS Vol. 115; no. 34; pp. E8067 - E8076 |
---|---|
Main Authors | , , , , , |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
United States
National Academy of Sciences
21.08.2018
|
Series | PNAS Plus |
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
Cover
Loading…
Summary: | The spatial representation of stimuli in sensory neocortices provides a scaffold for elucidating circuit mechanisms underlying sensory processing. However, the anterior piriform cortex (APC) lacks topology for odor identity as well as afferent and intracortical excitation. Consequently, olfactory processing is considered homogenous along the APC rostral–caudal (RC) axis. We recorded excitatory and inhibitory neurons in APC while optogenetically activating GABAergic interneurons along the RC axis. In contrast to excitation, we find opposing, spatially asymmetric inhibition onto pyramidal cells (PCs) and interneurons. PCs are strongly inhibited by caudal stimulation sites, whereas interneurons are strongly inhibited by rostral sites. At least two mechanisms underlie spatial asymmetries. Enhanced caudal inhibition of PCs is due to increased synaptic strength, whereas rostrally biased inhibition of interneurons is mediated by increased somatostatin–interneuron density. Altogether, we show differences in rostral and caudal inhibitory circuits in APC that may underlie spatial variation in odor processing along the RC axis. |
---|---|
Bibliography: | ObjectType-Article-1 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 content type line 23 Edited by Charles F. Stevens, The Salk Institute for Biological Studies, La Jolla, CA, and approved July 13, 2018 (received for review February 8, 2018) 1N.W.V. and M.C.-B. contributed equally to this work. Author contributions: A.M.L. and A.-M.M.O. designed research; A.M.L., N.W.V., M.C.-B., F.K.F., P.S., and A.-M.M.O. performed research; A.M.L., N.W.V., M.C.-B., F.K.F., and A.-M.M.O. analyzed data; and A.M.L. and A.-M.M.O. wrote the paper. |
ISSN: | 0027-8424 1091-6490 |
DOI: | 10.1073/pnas.1802428115 |