Misoprostol as an adjunct to overnight osmotic dilators prior to second trimester dilation and evacuation: A systematic review and meta-analysis

To understand effect of adjunct misoprostol on cervical preparation with overnight osmotic dilators for dilation and evacuation after 16 weeks gestation. We searched on-line reference databases using search terms for second trimester, abortion, misoprostol, and dilators. Randomized controlled trials...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inContraception (Stoneham) Vol. 101; no. 2; pp. 74 - 78
Main Authors Cahill, Erica P., Henkel, Andrea, Shaw, Jonathan G., Shaw, Kate A.
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published United States Elsevier Inc 01.02.2020
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text
ISSN0010-7824
1879-0518
1879-0518
DOI10.1016/j.contraception.2019.09.005

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:To understand effect of adjunct misoprostol on cervical preparation with overnight osmotic dilators for dilation and evacuation after 16 weeks gestation. We searched on-line reference databases using search terms for second trimester, abortion, misoprostol, and dilators. Randomized controlled trials of cervical preparation for second trimester D&E using overnight osmotic dilators comparing adjunct misoprostol to placebo were included. Weighted mean with standard deviation (SD) and pooled binary outcomes were compared. Among 84 articles identified, three met inclusion criteria (n = 457 subjects) adjunct misoprostol did not significantly decrease mean procedure times (8.5 ± 4.6 vs 9.6 ± 5.8 min, p = 0.78) or manual dilation (18% vs 28%, p = 0.23) when compared to placebo. There was no difference in total complications (p = 0.61), major complications (p = 0.44), or cervical lacerations (p = 0.87). Current limited evidence suggests adjunct misoprostol with osmotic dilators after 16 weeks does not affect procedure time or need for manual dilation. Further research is needed to determine the effect of adjunct misoprostol on major complications and blood loss.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ObjectType-Undefined-3
ISSN:0010-7824
1879-0518
1879-0518
DOI:10.1016/j.contraception.2019.09.005